1996 Hunter 290 vs 1975 Ericson 25+ — Comparison

1996 Hunter 2901996 Hunter 290
VS
1975 Ericson 25+

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1996 Hunter 2901975 Ericson 25+
General
ManufacturerHunterEricson
Year1996–20001975–1982
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSAUSA
DesignerGlenn HendersonBruce King
Dimensions
LOA8.84 m (29.0 ft)7.62 m (25.0 ft)
LWL7.47 m (24.5 ft)6.25 m (20.5 ft)
Beam2.97 m (9.7 ft)2.44 m (8.0 ft)
Draft1.52 m (5.0 ft)1.22 m (4.0 ft)
Weight
Displacement3,493 kg (7,701 lbs)1,905 kg (4,200 lbs)
Ballast1,361 kg (3,000 lbs)726 kg (1,601 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area38.9 m² (419 ft²)25.0 m² (269 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine15 HP7 HP
Fuel Capacity57 L (15.1 gal)23 L (6.1 gal)
Water Capacity76 L (20.1 gal)45 L (11.9 gal)
Accommodation
Berths64
Cabins11

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1996 Hunter 290
17.17
1975 Ericson 25+
16.54
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1996 Hunter 290
38.96
1975 Ericson 25+
38.11
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1996 Hunter 290
0.78
1975 Ericson 25+
0.79
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1996 Hunter 290
20.27
1975 Ericson 25+
20.11

Detailed Comparison

The 1996 Hunter 290 and 1975 Ericson 25+ represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1996 Hunter 290 is a 1990s design by Hunter from USA, while the 1975 Ericson 25+ is a 1970s offering from Ericson from USA. The 1996 Hunter 290 was penned by Glenn Henderson. The 1975 Ericson 25+ was designed by Bruce King.

In terms of size, the 1996 Hunter 290 measures 8.84m (29.0ft) overall with a beam of 2.97m, compared to the 1975 Ericson 25+ at 7.62m (25.0ft) with a 2.44m beam. The 1996 Hunter 290 is 1.22m longer than the 1975 Ericson 25+. The 1996 Hunter 290 displaces approximately 83% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1996 Hunter 290 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 17.17 and 38.9 m² of sail area. The 1975 Ericson 25+, with an SA/D of 16.54 and 25.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 1996 Hunter 290 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1996 Hunter 290 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 20.3) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.78). The 1975 Ericson 25+ has a comfort ratio of 20.1 and a capsize screening value of 0.79. The ballast ratios are 39.0% for the 1996 Hunter 290 and 38.1% for the 1975 Ericson 25+, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1996 Hunter 290 provides 6 berths in 1 cabin with 76L of water capacity and 57L of fuel. The 1975 Ericson 25+ offers 4 berths in 1 cabin with 45L water and 23L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1996 Hunter 290 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1996 Hunter 290 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1996 Hunter 290 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1996 Hunter 290 · 1975 Ericson 25+