1996 Najad 380 vs 1993 Feeling 36 — Comparison

1996 Najad 380
VS
1993 Feeling 36

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1996 Najad 3801993 Feeling 36
General
ManufacturerNajadFeeling
Year1996–20061993–2001
TypeSloopSloop
CountrySwedenFrance
DesignerJudel/VrolijkPhilippe Harlé
Dimensions
LOA11.55 m (37.9 ft)10.97 m (36.0 ft)
LWL9.50 m (31.2 ft)9.30 m (30.5 ft)
Beam3.55 m (11.6 ft)3.52 m (11.5 ft)
Draft1.85 m (6.1 ft)1.65 m (5.4 ft)
Weight
Displacement7,500 kg (16,535 lbs)6,200 kg (13,669 lbs)
Ballast3,050 kg (6,724 lbs)2,300 kg (5,071 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area62.0 m² (667 ft²)53.0 m² (571 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine40 HP25 HP
Fuel Capacity150 L (39.6 gal)90 L (23.8 gal)
Water Capacity260 L (68.7 gal)180 L (47.6 gal)
Accommodation
Berths66
Cabins22

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1996 Najad 380
16.44
1993 Feeling 36
15.96
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1996 Najad 380
40.67
1993 Feeling 36
37.10
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1996 Najad 380
0.73
1993 Feeling 36
0.77
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1996 Najad 380
20.83
1993 Feeling 36
18.55

Detailed Comparison

The 1996 Najad 380 and 1993 Feeling 36 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1996 Najad 380 is a 1990s design by Najad from Sweden, while the 1993 Feeling 36 is a 1990s offering from Feeling from France. The 1996 Najad 380 was penned by Judel/Vrolijk. The 1993 Feeling 36 was designed by Philippe Harlé.

In terms of size, the 1996 Najad 380 measures 11.55m (37.9ft) overall with a beam of 3.55m, compared to the 1993 Feeling 36 at 10.97m (36.0ft) with a 3.52m beam. The 1996 Najad 380 is 0.58m longer than the 1993 Feeling 36. The 1996 Najad 380 displaces approximately 21% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1996 Najad 380 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.44 and 62.0 m² of sail area. The 1993 Feeling 36, with an SA/D of 15.96 and 53.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 1996 Najad 380 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1996 Najad 380 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 20.8) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.73). The 1993 Feeling 36 has a comfort ratio of 18.6 and a capsize screening value of 0.77. The ballast ratios are 40.7% for the 1996 Najad 380 and 37.1% for the 1993 Feeling 36, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1996 Najad 380 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 260L of water capacity and 150L of fuel. The 1993 Feeling 36 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 180L water and 90L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1996 Najad 380 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1996 Najad 380 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1996 Najad 380 · 1993 Feeling 36