1996 Najad 380 vs 2013 Beneteau Figaro 3 — Comparison
2013 Beneteau Figaro 3
Specifications Side by Side
| Specification | 1996 Najad 380 | 2013 Beneteau Figaro 3 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Manufacturer | Najad | Beneteau |
| Year | 1996–2006 | 2013 |
| Type | Sloop | Sloop |
| Country | Sweden | France |
| Designer | Judel/Vrolijk | VPLP / Van Peteghem Lauriot-Prévost |
| Dimensions | ||
| LOA | 11.55 m (37.9 ft) | 10.10 m (33.1 ft) |
| LWL | 9.50 m (31.2 ft) | 9.45 m (31.0 ft) |
| Beam | 3.55 m (11.6 ft) | 3.40 m (11.2 ft) |
| Draft | 1.85 m (6.1 ft) | 2.10 m (6.9 ft) |
| Weight | ||
| Displacement | 7,500 kg (16,535 lbs) | 3,450 kg (7,606 lbs) |
| Ballast | 3,050 kg (6,724 lbs) | 1,500 kg (3,307 lbs) |
| Sailing | ||
| Sail Area | 62.0 m² (667 ft²) | 65.0 m² (700 ft²) |
| Hull Material | Fiberglass | Fiberglass |
| Keel Type | Fin | Fin |
| Engine & Tanks | ||
| Engine | 40 HP | 20 HP |
| Fuel Capacity | 150 L (39.6 gal) | 60 L (15.9 gal) |
| Water Capacity | 260 L (68.7 gal) | 40 L (10.6 gal) |
| Accommodation | ||
| Berths | 6 | 2 |
| Cabins | 2 | 1 |
Performance Comparison
Detailed Comparison
The 1996 Najad 380 and 2013 Beneteau Figaro 3 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1996 Najad 380 is a 1990s design by Najad from Sweden, while the 2013 Beneteau Figaro 3 is a modern offering from Beneteau from France. The 1996 Najad 380 was penned by Judel/Vrolijk. The 2013 Beneteau Figaro 3 was designed by VPLP / Van Peteghem Lauriot-Prévost.
In terms of size, the 1996 Najad 380 measures 11.55m (37.9ft) overall with a beam of 3.55m, compared to the 2013 Beneteau Figaro 3 at 10.10m (33.1ft) with a 3.40m beam. The 1996 Najad 380 is 1.45m longer than the 2013 Beneteau Figaro 3. The 1996 Najad 380 displaces approximately 117% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.
Looking at performance, the 1996 Najad 380 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.44 and 62.0 m² of sail area. The 2013 Beneteau Figaro 3, with an SA/D of 28.93 and 65.0 m² of canvas, offers generous sail power for spirited sailing. The 2013 Beneteau Figaro 3 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.
For comfort and safety, the 1996 Najad 380 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 20.8) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.73). The 2013 Beneteau Figaro 3 has a comfort ratio of 11.2 and a capsize screening value of 0.90. The ballast ratios are 40.7% for the 1996 Najad 380 and 43.5% for the 2013 Beneteau Figaro 3, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.
Below deck, the 1996 Najad 380 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 260L of water capacity and 150L of fuel. The 2013 Beneteau Figaro 3 offers 2 berths in 1 cabin with 40L water and 60L fuel capacity.
Verdict
For cruising: The 1996 Najad 380 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.
For racing: The 2013 Beneteau Figaro 3 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.
For liveaboard: The 1996 Najad 380 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.
Compare Different Boats
Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats
Or view individual specs: 1996 Najad 380 · 2013 Beneteau Figaro 3