1997 Catalina 380 vs Hunter 306 — Comparison

1997 Catalina 380 1997 Catalina 380
VS
Hunter 306 Hunter 306

Specifications Side by Side

Specification 1997 Catalina 380 Hunter 306
General
Manufacturer Catalina Hunter
Year 1997–2005 1999–2004
Type Sloop Sloop
Country USA USA
Designer Gerry Douglas Glenn Henderson
Dimensions
LOA 11.58 m (38.0 ft) 9.25 m (30.3 ft)
LWL 9.75 m (32.0 ft) 8.08 m (26.5 ft)
Beam 3.72 m (12.2 ft) 3.10 m (10.2 ft)
Draft 1.83 m (6.0 ft) 1.65 m (5.4 ft)
Weight
Displacement 7,711 kg (17,000 lbs) 3,990 kg (8,796 lbs)
Ballast 3,175 kg (7,000 lbs) 1,588 kg (3,501 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area 62.4 m² (672 ft²) 43.0 m² (463 ft²)
Hull Material Fiberglass Fiberglass
Keel Type Fin Fin
Engine & Tanks
Engine 35 HP 18 HP
Fuel Capacity 114 L (30.1 gal) 57 L (15.1 gal)
Water Capacity 227 L (60.0 gal) 114 L (30.1 gal)
Accommodation
Berths 7 6
Cabins 2 2

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1997 Catalina 380
16.24
Hunter 306
17.37
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1997 Catalina 380
41.17
Hunter 306
39.80
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1997 Catalina 380
0.75
Hunter 306
0.78
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1997 Catalina 380
19.41
Hunter 306
19.11

Detailed Comparison

The 1997 Catalina 380 and Hunter 306 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1997 Catalina 380 is a 1990s design by Catalina from USA, while the Hunter 306 is a 1990s offering from Hunter from USA. The 1997 Catalina 380 was penned by Gerry Douglas. The Hunter 306 was designed by Glenn Henderson.

In terms of size, the 1997 Catalina 380 measures 11.58m (38.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.72m, compared to the Hunter 306 at 9.25m (30.3ft) with a 3.10m beam. The 1997 Catalina 380 is 2.33m longer than the Hunter 306. The 1997 Catalina 380 displaces approximately 93% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1997 Catalina 380 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.24 and 62.4 m² of sail area. The Hunter 306, with an SA/D of 17.37 and 43.0 m² of canvas, offers good sail power for versatile performance. The Hunter 306 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1997 Catalina 380 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 19.4) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.75). The Hunter 306 has a comfort ratio of 19.1 and a capsize screening value of 0.78. The ballast ratios are 41.2% for the 1997 Catalina 380 and 39.8% for the Hunter 306, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1997 Catalina 380 provides 7 berths in 2 cabins with 227L of water capacity and 114L of fuel. The Hunter 306 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 114L water and 57L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1997 Catalina 380 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The Hunter 306 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1997 Catalina 380 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

VS