Catalina 390 vs 1990 Feeling 32 — Comparison

Catalina 390
VS
1990 Feeling 321990 Feeling 32

Specifications Side by Side

SpecificationCatalina 3901990 Feeling 32
General
ManufacturerCatalinaFeeling
Year1997–20031990–1998
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSAFrance
DesignerGerry DouglasPhilippe Harlé
Dimensions
LOA11.89 m (39.0 ft)9.85 m (32.3 ft)
LWL10.21 m (33.5 ft)8.20 m (26.9 ft)
Beam3.76 m (12.3 ft)3.15 m (10.3 ft)
Draft1.98 m (6.5 ft)1.50 m (4.9 ft)
Weight
Displacement8,256 kg (18,201 lbs)4,700 kg (10,362 lbs)
Ballast3,266 kg (7,200 lbs)1,700 kg (3,748 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area65.5 m² (705 ft²)40.0 m² (431 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine35 HP18 HP
Fuel Capacity114 L (30.1 gal)60 L (15.9 gal)
Water Capacity265 L (70.0 gal)120 L (31.7 gal)
Accommodation
Berths75
Cabins22

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
Catalina 390
16.29
1990 Feeling 32
14.49
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
Catalina 390
39.56
1990 Feeling 32
36.17
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
Catalina 390
0.75
1990 Feeling 32
0.75
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
Catalina 390
18.93
1990 Feeling 32
20.72

Detailed Comparison

The Catalina 390 and 1990 Feeling 32 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The Catalina 390 is a 1990s design by Catalina from USA, while the 1990 Feeling 32 is a 1990s offering from Feeling from France. The Catalina 390 was penned by Gerry Douglas. The 1990 Feeling 32 was designed by Philippe Harlé.

In terms of size, the Catalina 390 measures 11.89m (39.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.76m, compared to the 1990 Feeling 32 at 9.85m (32.3ft) with a 3.15m beam. The Catalina 390 is 2.04m longer than the 1990 Feeling 32. The Catalina 390 displaces approximately 76% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the Catalina 390 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.29 and 65.5 m² of sail area. The 1990 Feeling 32, with an SA/D of 14.49 and 40.0 m² of canvas, offers modest sail power for its displacement. The Catalina 390 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the Catalina 390 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 18.9) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.75). The 1990 Feeling 32 has a comfort ratio of 20.7 and a capsize screening value of 0.75. The ballast ratios are 39.6% for the Catalina 390 and 36.2% for the 1990 Feeling 32, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the Catalina 390 provides 7 berths in 2 cabins with 265L of water capacity and 114L of fuel. The 1990 Feeling 32 offers 5 berths in 2 cabins with 120L water and 60L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1990 Feeling 32 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The Catalina 390 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The Catalina 390 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: Catalina 390 · 1990 Feeling 32