Catalina 390 vs Hunter 31 — Comparison
Hunter 31
Specifications Side by Side
| Specification | Catalina 390 | Hunter 31 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Manufacturer | Catalina | Hunter |
| Year | 1997–2003 | 2000–2005 |
| Type | Sloop | Sloop |
| Country | USA | USA |
| Designer | Gerry Douglas | Glenn Henderson |
| Dimensions | ||
| LOA | 11.89 m (39.0 ft) | 9.45 m (31.0 ft) |
| LWL | 10.21 m (33.5 ft) | 8.23 m (27.0 ft) |
| Beam | 3.76 m (12.3 ft) | 3.12 m (10.2 ft) |
| Draft | 1.98 m (6.5 ft) | 1.68 m (5.5 ft) |
| Weight | ||
| Displacement | 8,256 kg (18,201 lbs) | 4,082 kg (8,999 lbs) |
| Ballast | 3,266 kg (7,200 lbs) | 1,588 kg (3,501 lbs) |
| Sailing | ||
| Sail Area | 65.5 m² (705 ft²) | 44.0 m² (474 ft²) |
| Hull Material | Fiberglass | Fiberglass |
| Keel Type | Fin | Fin |
| Engine & Tanks | ||
| Engine | 35 HP | 18 HP |
| Fuel Capacity | 114 L (30.1 gal) | 57 L (15.1 gal) |
| Water Capacity | 265 L (70.0 gal) | 114 L (30.1 gal) |
| Accommodation | ||
| Berths | 7 | 6 |
| Cabins | 2 | 2 |
Performance Comparison
Detailed Comparison
The Catalina 390 and Hunter 31 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The Catalina 390 is a 1990s design by Catalina from USA, while the Hunter 31 is a 2000s offering from Hunter from USA. The Catalina 390 was penned by Gerry Douglas. The Hunter 31 was designed by Glenn Henderson.
In terms of size, the Catalina 390 measures 11.89m (39.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.76m, compared to the Hunter 31 at 9.45m (31.0ft) with a 3.12m beam. The Catalina 390 is 2.44m longer than the Hunter 31. The Catalina 390 displaces approximately 102% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.
Looking at performance, the Catalina 390 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.29 and 65.5 m² of sail area. The Hunter 31, with an SA/D of 17.51 and 44.0 m² of canvas, offers good sail power for versatile performance. The Hunter 31 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.
For comfort and safety, the Catalina 390 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 18.9) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.75). The Hunter 31 has a comfort ratio of 18.7 and a capsize screening value of 0.78. The ballast ratios are 39.6% for the Catalina 390 and 38.9% for the Hunter 31, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.
Below deck, the Catalina 390 provides 7 berths in 2 cabins with 265L of water capacity and 114L of fuel. The Hunter 31 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 114L water and 57L fuel capacity.
Verdict
For cruising: The Catalina 390 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.
For racing: The Hunter 31 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.
For liveaboard: The Catalina 390 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.
Compare Different Boats
Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats
Or view individual specs: Catalina 390 · Hunter 31