1997 Dufour 30 Classic vs Hunter 33 — Comparison

1997 Dufour 30 Classic 1997 Dufour 30 Classic
VS
Hunter 33 Hunter 33

Specifications Side by Side

Specification 1997 Dufour 30 Classic Hunter 33
General
Manufacturer Dufour Hunter
Year 1997–2003 1988–1994
Type Sloop Sloop
Country France USA
Designer Umberto Felci Hunter Design Team
Dimensions
LOA 9.15 m (30.0 ft) 10.06 m (33.0 ft)
LWL 7.80 m (25.6 ft) 8.53 m (28.0 ft)
Beam 3.10 m (10.2 ft) 3.35 m (11.0 ft)
Draft 1.60 m (5.2 ft) 1.68 m (5.5 ft)
Weight
Displacement 3,800 kg (8,378 lbs) 4,763 kg (10,501 lbs)
Ballast 1,400 kg (3,086 lbs) 1,814 kg (3,999 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area 40.0 m² (431 ft²) 48.0 m² (517 ft²)
Hull Material Fiberglass Fiberglass
Keel Type Fin Fin
Engine & Tanks
Engine 15 HP 21 HP
Fuel Capacity 50 L (13.2 gal) 76 L (20.1 gal)
Water Capacity 90 L (23.8 gal) 151 L (39.9 gal)
Accommodation
Berths 5 6
Cabins 2 2

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1997 Dufour 30 Classic
16.69
Hunter 33
17.23
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1997 Dufour 30 Classic
36.84
Hunter 33
38.09
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1997 Dufour 30 Classic
0.80
Hunter 33
0.80
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1997 Dufour 30 Classic
19.22
Hunter 33
18.10

Detailed Comparison

The 1997 Dufour 30 Classic and Hunter 33 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1997 Dufour 30 Classic is a 1990s design by Dufour from France, while the Hunter 33 is a 1980s offering from Hunter from USA. The 1997 Dufour 30 Classic was penned by Umberto Felci. The Hunter 33 was designed by Hunter Design Team.

In terms of size, the 1997 Dufour 30 Classic measures 9.15m (30.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.10m, compared to the Hunter 33 at 10.06m (33.0ft) with a 3.35m beam. The Hunter 33 is 0.91m longer than the 1997 Dufour 30 Classic. The Hunter 33 displaces approximately 25% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1997 Dufour 30 Classic has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.69 and 40.0 m² of sail area. The Hunter 33, with an SA/D of 17.23 and 48.0 m² of canvas, offers good sail power for versatile performance. The Hunter 33 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1997 Dufour 30 Classic offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 19.2) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.80). The Hunter 33 has a comfort ratio of 18.1 and a capsize screening value of 0.80. The ballast ratios are 36.8% for the 1997 Dufour 30 Classic and 38.1% for the Hunter 33, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1997 Dufour 30 Classic provides 5 berths in 2 cabins with 90L of water capacity and 50L of fuel. The Hunter 33 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 151L water and 76L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1997 Dufour 30 Classic is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The Hunter 33 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The Hunter 33 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

VS