1997 Dufour 30 Classic vs Hanse 320 — Comparison

1997 Dufour 30 Classic 1997 Dufour 30 Classic
VS
Hanse 320 Hanse 320

Specifications Side by Side

Specification 1997 Dufour 30 Classic Hanse 320
General
Manufacturer Dufour Hanse
Year 1997–2003 2005–2010
Type Sloop Sloop
Country France Germany
Designer Umberto Felci judel/vrolijk & co
Dimensions
LOA 9.15 m (30.0 ft) 9.92 m (32.5 ft)
LWL 7.80 m (25.6 ft) 8.80 m (28.9 ft)
Beam 3.10 m (10.2 ft) 3.28 m (10.8 ft)
Draft 1.60 m (5.2 ft) 1.70 m (5.6 ft)
Weight
Displacement 3,800 kg (8,378 lbs) 4,600 kg (10,141 lbs)
Ballast 1,400 kg (3,086 lbs) 1,400 kg (3,086 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area 40.0 m² (431 ft²) 46.0 m² (495 ft²)
Hull Material Fiberglass Fiberglass
Keel Type Fin Fin
Engine & Tanks
Engine 15 HP 18 HP
Fuel Capacity 50 L (13.2 gal) 90 L (23.8 gal)
Water Capacity 90 L (23.8 gal) 150 L (39.6 gal)
Accommodation
Berths 5 6
Cabins 2 2

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1997 Dufour 30 Classic
16.69
Hanse 320
16.90
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1997 Dufour 30 Classic
36.84
Hanse 320
30.43
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1997 Dufour 30 Classic
0.80
Hanse 320
0.79
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1997 Dufour 30 Classic
19.22
Hanse 320
17.40

Detailed Comparison

The 1997 Dufour 30 Classic and Hanse 320 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1997 Dufour 30 Classic is a 1990s design by Dufour from France, while the Hanse 320 is a 2000s offering from Hanse from Germany. The 1997 Dufour 30 Classic was penned by Umberto Felci. The Hanse 320 was designed by judel/vrolijk & co.

In terms of size, the 1997 Dufour 30 Classic measures 9.15m (30.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.10m, compared to the Hanse 320 at 9.92m (32.5ft) with a 3.28m beam. The Hanse 320 is 0.77m longer than the 1997 Dufour 30 Classic. The Hanse 320 displaces approximately 21% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1997 Dufour 30 Classic has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.69 and 40.0 m² of sail area. The Hanse 320, with an SA/D of 16.90 and 46.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The Hanse 320 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1997 Dufour 30 Classic offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 19.2) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.80). The Hanse 320 has a comfort ratio of 17.4 and a capsize screening value of 0.79. The ballast ratios are 36.8% for the 1997 Dufour 30 Classic and 30.4% for the Hanse 320, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1997 Dufour 30 Classic provides 5 berths in 2 cabins with 90L of water capacity and 50L of fuel. The Hanse 320 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 150L water and 90L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1997 Dufour 30 Classic is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The Hanse 320 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The Hanse 320 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

VS