1997 Hallberg-Rassy 34 vs 1982 Westerly Konsort — Comparison

1997 Hallberg-Rassy 341997 Hallberg-Rassy 34
VS
1982 Westerly Konsort1982 Westerly Konsort

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1997 Hallberg-Rassy 341982 Westerly Konsort
General
ManufacturerHallberg-RassyWesterly
Year1997–20071982–1990
TypeSloopSloop
CountrySwedenUK
DesignerGerman FrersEd Dubois
Dimensions
LOA10.35 m (34.0 ft)9.50 m (31.2 ft)
LWL8.85 m (29.0 ft)7.70 m (25.3 ft)
Beam3.34 m (11.0 ft)3.10 m (10.2 ft)
Draft1.70 m (5.6 ft)1.07 m (3.5 ft)
Weight
Displacement5,800 kg (12,787 lbs)4,536 kg (10,000 lbs)
Ballast2,400 kg (5,291 lbs)1,633 kg (3,600 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area53.0 m² (571 ft²)34.0 m² (366 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinBilge
Engine & Tanks
Engine28 HP15 HP
Fuel Capacity120 L (31.7 gal)68 L (18.0 gal)
Water Capacity200 L (52.8 gal)114 L (30.1 gal)
Accommodation
Berths66
Cabins22

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1997 Hallberg-Rassy 34
16.68
1982 Westerly Konsort
12.61
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1997 Hallberg-Rassy 34
41.38
1982 Westerly Konsort
36.00
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1997 Hallberg-Rassy 34
0.74
1982 Westerly Konsort
0.75
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1997 Hallberg-Rassy 34
20.67
1982 Westerly Konsort
22.75

Detailed Comparison

The 1997 Hallberg-Rassy 34 and 1982 Westerly Konsort represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1997 Hallberg-Rassy 34 is a 1990s design by Hallberg-Rassy from Sweden, while the 1982 Westerly Konsort is a 1980s offering from Westerly from UK. The 1997 Hallberg-Rassy 34 was penned by German Frers. The 1982 Westerly Konsort was designed by Ed Dubois.

In terms of size, the 1997 Hallberg-Rassy 34 measures 10.35m (34.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.34m, compared to the 1982 Westerly Konsort at 9.50m (31.2ft) with a 3.10m beam. The 1997 Hallberg-Rassy 34 is 0.85m longer than the 1982 Westerly Konsort. The 1997 Hallberg-Rassy 34 displaces approximately 28% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1997 Hallberg-Rassy 34 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.68 and 53.0 m² of sail area. The 1982 Westerly Konsort, with an SA/D of 12.61 and 34.0 m² of canvas, offers modest sail power for its displacement. The 1997 Hallberg-Rassy 34 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1997 Hallberg-Rassy 34 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 20.7) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.74). The 1982 Westerly Konsort has a comfort ratio of 22.8 and a capsize screening value of 0.75. The ballast ratios are 41.4% for the 1997 Hallberg-Rassy 34 and 36.0% for the 1982 Westerly Konsort, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1997 Hallberg-Rassy 34 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 200L of water capacity and 120L of fuel. The 1982 Westerly Konsort offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 114L water and 68L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1982 Westerly Konsort is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1997 Hallberg-Rassy 34 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1997 Hallberg-Rassy 34 · 1982 Westerly Konsort