1997 Moody 38 vs Catalina 34 MkII — Comparison
Specifications Side by Side
| Specification | 1997 Moody 38 | Catalina 34 MkII |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Manufacturer | Moody | Catalina |
| Year | 1997–2003 | 1995–2004 |
| Type | Sloop | Sloop |
| Country | UK | USA |
| Designer | Bill Dixon | Gerry Douglas |
| Dimensions | ||
| LOA | 11.58 m (38.0 ft) | 10.36 m (34.0 ft) |
| LWL | 9.60 m (31.5 ft) | 9.14 m (30.0 ft) |
| Beam | 3.72 m (12.2 ft) | 3.40 m (11.2 ft) |
| Draft | 1.37 m (4.5 ft) | 1.75 m (5.7 ft) |
| Weight | ||
| Displacement | 8,165 kg (18,001 lbs) | 5,443 kg (12,000 lbs) |
| Ballast | 3,175 kg (7,000 lbs) | 2,041 kg (4,500 lbs) |
| Sailing | ||
| Sail Area | 59.8 m² (644 ft²) | 52.0 m² (560 ft²) |
| Hull Material | Fiberglass | Fiberglass |
| Keel Type | Bilge | Fin |
| Engine & Tanks | ||
| Engine | 35 HP | 21 HP |
| Fuel Capacity | 114 L (30.1 gal) | 76 L (20.1 gal) |
| Water Capacity | 227 L (60.0 gal) | 151 L (39.9 gal) |
| Accommodation | ||
| Berths | 7 | 6 |
| Cabins | 2 | 2 |
Performance Comparison
Detailed Comparison
The 1997 Moody 38 and Catalina 34 MkII represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1997 Moody 38 is a 1990s design by Moody from UK, while the Catalina 34 MkII is a 1990s offering from Catalina from USA. The 1997 Moody 38 was penned by Bill Dixon. The Catalina 34 MkII was designed by Gerry Douglas.
In terms of size, the 1997 Moody 38 measures 11.58m (38.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.72m, compared to the Catalina 34 MkII at 10.36m (34.0ft) with a 3.40m beam. The 1997 Moody 38 is 1.22m longer than the Catalina 34 MkII. The 1997 Moody 38 displaces approximately 50% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.
Looking at performance, the 1997 Moody 38 has modest sail power for its displacement with an SA/D ratio of 14.98 and 59.8 m² of sail area. The Catalina 34 MkII, with an SA/D of 17.08 and 52.0 m² of canvas, offers good sail power for versatile performance. The Catalina 34 MkII has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.
For comfort and safety, the 1997 Moody 38 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 21.0) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.74). The Catalina 34 MkII has a comfort ratio of 18.1 and a capsize screening value of 0.77. The ballast ratios are 38.9% for the 1997 Moody 38 and 37.5% for the Catalina 34 MkII, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.
Below deck, the 1997 Moody 38 provides 7 berths in 2 cabins with 227L of water capacity and 114L of fuel. The Catalina 34 MkII offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 151L water and 76L fuel capacity.
Verdict
For cruising: The 1997 Moody 38 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.
For racing: The Catalina 34 MkII has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.
For liveaboard: The 1997 Moody 38 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.
Compare Different Boats
Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats
Or view individual specs: 1997 Moody 38 · Catalina 34 MkII