1997 Moody 38 vs 1995 Feeling 39 — Comparison

1997 Moody 38
VS
1995 Feeling 39

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1997 Moody 381995 Feeling 39
General
ManufacturerMoodyFeeling
Year1997–20031995–2003
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUKFrance
DesignerBill DixonPhilippe Harlé
Dimensions
LOA11.58 m (38.0 ft)11.80 m (38.7 ft)
LWL9.60 m (31.5 ft)10.06 m (33.0 ft)
Beam3.72 m (12.2 ft)3.78 m (12.4 ft)
Draft1.37 m (4.5 ft)1.80 m (5.9 ft)
Weight
Displacement8,165 kg (18,001 lbs)7,800 kg (17,196 lbs)
Ballast3,175 kg (7,000 lbs)3,000 kg (6,614 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area59.8 m² (644 ft²)66.0 m² (710 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeBilgeFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine35 HP35 HP
Fuel Capacity114 L (30.1 gal)120 L (31.7 gal)
Water Capacity227 L (60.0 gal)250 L (66.0 gal)
Accommodation
Berths77
Cabins23

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1997 Moody 38
14.98
1995 Feeling 39
17.05
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1997 Moody 38
38.89
1995 Feeling 39
38.46
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1997 Moody 38
0.74
1995 Feeling 39
0.76
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1997 Moody 38
20.98
1995 Feeling 39
18.21

Detailed Comparison

The 1997 Moody 38 and 1995 Feeling 39 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1997 Moody 38 is a 1990s design by Moody from UK, while the 1995 Feeling 39 is a 1990s offering from Feeling from France. The 1997 Moody 38 was penned by Bill Dixon. The 1995 Feeling 39 was designed by Philippe Harlé.

In terms of size, the 1997 Moody 38 measures 11.58m (38.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.72m, compared to the 1995 Feeling 39 at 11.80m (38.7ft) with a 3.78m beam. The 1995 Feeling 39 is 0.22m longer than the 1997 Moody 38. The 1997 Moody 38 displaces approximately 5% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1997 Moody 38 has modest sail power for its displacement with an SA/D ratio of 14.98 and 59.8 m² of sail area. The 1995 Feeling 39, with an SA/D of 17.05 and 66.0 m² of canvas, offers good sail power for versatile performance. The 1995 Feeling 39 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1997 Moody 38 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 21.0) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.74). The 1995 Feeling 39 has a comfort ratio of 18.2 and a capsize screening value of 0.76. The ballast ratios are 38.9% for the 1997 Moody 38 and 38.5% for the 1995 Feeling 39, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1997 Moody 38 provides 7 berths in 2 cabins with 227L of water capacity and 114L of fuel. The 1995 Feeling 39 offers 7 berths in 3 cabins with 250L water and 120L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1997 Moody 38 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1995 Feeling 39 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1997 Moody 38 · 1995 Feeling 39