1997 Moody 38 vs Bavaria 42 — Comparison

1997 Moody 38
VS
Bavaria 42Bavaria 42

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1997 Moody 38Bavaria 42
General
ManufacturerMoodyBavaria
Year1997–20032003–2008
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUKGermany
DesignerBill DixonJ&J Design
Dimensions
LOA11.58 m (38.0 ft)12.99 m (42.6 ft)
LWL9.60 m (31.5 ft)11.29 m (37.0 ft)
Beam3.72 m (12.2 ft)4.06 m (13.3 ft)
Draft1.37 m (4.5 ft)1.95 m (6.4 ft)
Weight
Displacement8,165 kg (18,001 lbs)9,300 kg (20,503 lbs)
Ballast3,175 kg (7,000 lbs)2,900 kg (6,393 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area59.8 m² (644 ft²)79.0 m² (850 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeBilgeFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine35 HP55 HP
Fuel Capacity114 L (30.1 gal)200 L (52.8 gal)
Water Capacity227 L (60.0 gal)350 L (92.5 gal)
Accommodation
Berths78
Cabins23

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1997 Moody 38
14.98
Bavaria 42
18.15
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1997 Moody 38
38.89
Bavaria 42
31.18
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1997 Moody 38
0.74
Bavaria 42
0.77
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1997 Moody 38
20.98
Bavaria 42
15.87

Detailed Comparison

The 1997 Moody 38 and Bavaria 42 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1997 Moody 38 is a 1990s design by Moody from UK, while the Bavaria 42 is a 2000s offering from Bavaria from Germany. The 1997 Moody 38 was penned by Bill Dixon. The Bavaria 42 was designed by J&J Design.

In terms of size, the 1997 Moody 38 measures 11.58m (38.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.72m, compared to the Bavaria 42 at 12.99m (42.6ft) with a 4.06m beam. The Bavaria 42 is 1.41m longer than the 1997 Moody 38. The Bavaria 42 displaces approximately 14% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1997 Moody 38 has modest sail power for its displacement with an SA/D ratio of 14.98 and 59.8 m² of sail area. The Bavaria 42, with an SA/D of 18.15 and 79.0 m² of canvas, offers good sail power for versatile performance. The Bavaria 42 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1997 Moody 38 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 21.0) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.74). The Bavaria 42 has a comfort ratio of 15.9 and a capsize screening value of 0.77. The ballast ratios are 38.9% for the 1997 Moody 38 and 31.2% for the Bavaria 42, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1997 Moody 38 provides 7 berths in 2 cabins with 227L of water capacity and 114L of fuel. The Bavaria 42 offers 8 berths in 3 cabins with 350L water and 200L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1997 Moody 38 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The Bavaria 42 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The Bavaria 42 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1997 Moody 38 · Bavaria 42