1997 Moody 38 vs Dufour 365 Grand Large — Comparison

1997 Moody 38 1997 Moody 38
VS
Dufour 365 Grand Large Dufour 365 Grand Large

Specifications Side by Side

Specification 1997 Moody 38 Dufour 365 Grand Large
General
Manufacturer Moody Dufour
Year 1997–2003 2003–2007
Type Sloop Sloop
Country UK France
Designer Bill Dixon Umberto Felci
Dimensions
LOA 11.58 m (38.0 ft) 10.97 m (36.0 ft)
LWL 9.60 m (31.5 ft) 9.72 m (31.9 ft)
Beam 3.72 m (12.2 ft) 3.52 m (11.5 ft)
Draft 1.37 m (4.5 ft) 1.80 m (5.9 ft)
Weight
Displacement 8,165 kg (18,001 lbs) 6,100 kg (13,448 lbs)
Ballast 3,175 kg (7,000 lbs) 1,850 kg (4,079 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area 59.8 m² (644 ft²) 57.5 m² (619 ft²)
Hull Material Fiberglass Fiberglass
Keel Type Bilge Fin
Engine & Tanks
Engine 35 HP 21 HP
Fuel Capacity 114 L (30.1 gal) 120 L (31.7 gal)
Water Capacity 227 L (60.0 gal) 210 L (55.5 gal)
Accommodation
Berths 7 6
Cabins 2 2

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1997 Moody 38
14.98
Dufour 365 Grand Large
17.50
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1997 Moody 38
38.89
Dufour 365 Grand Large
30.33
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1997 Moody 38
0.74
Dufour 365 Grand Large
0.77
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1997 Moody 38
20.98
Dufour 365 Grand Large
17.21

Detailed Comparison

The 1997 Moody 38 and Dufour 365 Grand Large represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1997 Moody 38 is a 1990s design by Moody from UK, while the Dufour 365 Grand Large is a 2000s offering from Dufour from France. The 1997 Moody 38 was penned by Bill Dixon. The Dufour 365 Grand Large was designed by Umberto Felci.

In terms of size, the 1997 Moody 38 measures 11.58m (38.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.72m, compared to the Dufour 365 Grand Large at 10.97m (36.0ft) with a 3.52m beam. The 1997 Moody 38 is 0.61m longer than the Dufour 365 Grand Large. The 1997 Moody 38 displaces approximately 34% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1997 Moody 38 has modest sail power for its displacement with an SA/D ratio of 14.98 and 59.8 m² of sail area. The Dufour 365 Grand Large, with an SA/D of 17.50 and 57.5 m² of canvas, offers good sail power for versatile performance. The Dufour 365 Grand Large has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1997 Moody 38 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 21.0) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.74). The Dufour 365 Grand Large has a comfort ratio of 17.2 and a capsize screening value of 0.77. The ballast ratios are 38.9% for the 1997 Moody 38 and 30.3% for the Dufour 365 Grand Large, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1997 Moody 38 provides 7 berths in 2 cabins with 227L of water capacity and 114L of fuel. The Dufour 365 Grand Large offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 210L water and 120L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1997 Moody 38 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The Dufour 365 Grand Large has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1997 Moody 38 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

VS