1997 Moody 38 vs 2004 Najad 405 — Comparison
Specifications Side by Side
| Specification | 1997 Moody 38 | 2004 Najad 405 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Manufacturer | Moody | Najad |
| Year | 1997–2003 | 2004–2012 |
| Type | Sloop | Sloop |
| Country | UK | Sweden |
| Designer | Bill Dixon | Judel/Vrolijk |
| Dimensions | ||
| LOA | 11.58 m (38.0 ft) | 12.40 m (40.7 ft) |
| LWL | 9.60 m (31.5 ft) | 10.40 m (34.1 ft) |
| Beam | 3.72 m (12.2 ft) | 3.82 m (12.5 ft) |
| Draft | 1.37 m (4.5 ft) | 2.00 m (6.6 ft) |
| Weight | ||
| Displacement | 8,165 kg (18,001 lbs) | 9,200 kg (20,283 lbs) |
| Ballast | 3,175 kg (7,000 lbs) | 3,600 kg (7,937 lbs) |
| Sailing | ||
| Sail Area | 59.8 m² (644 ft²) | 73.0 m² (786 ft²) |
| Hull Material | Fiberglass | Fiberglass |
| Keel Type | Bilge | Fin |
| Engine & Tanks | ||
| Engine | 35 HP | 55 HP |
| Fuel Capacity | 114 L (30.1 gal) | 200 L (52.8 gal) |
| Water Capacity | 227 L (60.0 gal) | 350 L (92.5 gal) |
| Accommodation | ||
| Berths | 7 | 7 |
| Cabins | 2 | 3 |
Performance Comparison
Detailed Comparison
The 1997 Moody 38 and 2004 Najad 405 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1997 Moody 38 is a 1990s design by Moody from UK, while the 2004 Najad 405 is a 2000s offering from Najad from Sweden. The 1997 Moody 38 was penned by Bill Dixon. The 2004 Najad 405 was designed by Judel/Vrolijk.
In terms of size, the 1997 Moody 38 measures 11.58m (38.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.72m, compared to the 2004 Najad 405 at 12.40m (40.7ft) with a 3.82m beam. The 2004 Najad 405 is 0.82m longer than the 1997 Moody 38. The 2004 Najad 405 displaces approximately 13% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.
Looking at performance, the 1997 Moody 38 has modest sail power for its displacement with an SA/D ratio of 14.98 and 59.8 m² of sail area. The 2004 Najad 405, with an SA/D of 16.89 and 73.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 2004 Najad 405 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.
For comfort and safety, the 1997 Moody 38 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 21.0) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.74). The 2004 Najad 405 has a comfort ratio of 19.6 and a capsize screening value of 0.73. The ballast ratios are 38.9% for the 1997 Moody 38 and 39.1% for the 2004 Najad 405, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.
Below deck, the 1997 Moody 38 provides 7 berths in 2 cabins with 227L of water capacity and 114L of fuel. The 2004 Najad 405 offers 7 berths in 3 cabins with 350L water and 200L fuel capacity.
Verdict
For cruising: The 1997 Moody 38 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.
For racing: The 2004 Najad 405 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.
For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.
Compare Different Boats
Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats
Or view individual specs: 1997 Moody 38 · 2004 Najad 405