1997 Moody 38 vs Dufour 45E — Comparison

1997 Moody 38
VS
Dufour 45EDufour 45E

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1997 Moody 38Dufour 45E
General
ManufacturerMoodyDufour
Year1997–20032008–2011
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUKFrance
DesignerBill DixonUmberto Felci
Dimensions
LOA11.58 m (38.0 ft)13.80 m (45.3 ft)
LWL9.60 m (31.5 ft)11.90 m (39.0 ft)
Beam3.72 m (12.2 ft)4.20 m (13.8 ft)
Draft1.37 m (4.5 ft)2.10 m (6.9 ft)
Weight
Displacement8,165 kg (18,001 lbs)10,500 kg (23,149 lbs)
Ballast3,175 kg (7,000 lbs)3,200 kg (7,055 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area59.8 m² (644 ft²)88.0 m² (947 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeBilgeFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine35 HP55 HP
Fuel Capacity114 L (30.1 gal)200 L (52.8 gal)
Water Capacity227 L (60.0 gal)380 L (100.4 gal)
Accommodation
Berths78
Cabins23

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1997 Moody 38
14.98
Dufour 45E
18.64
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1997 Moody 38
38.89
Dufour 45E
30.48
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1997 Moody 38
0.74
Dufour 45E
0.77
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1997 Moody 38
20.98
Dufour 45E
15.34

Detailed Comparison

The 1997 Moody 38 and Dufour 45E represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1997 Moody 38 is a 1990s design by Moody from UK, while the Dufour 45E is a 2000s offering from Dufour from France. The 1997 Moody 38 was penned by Bill Dixon. The Dufour 45E was designed by Umberto Felci.

In terms of size, the 1997 Moody 38 measures 11.58m (38.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.72m, compared to the Dufour 45E at 13.80m (45.3ft) with a 4.20m beam. The Dufour 45E is 2.22m longer than the 1997 Moody 38. The Dufour 45E displaces approximately 29% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1997 Moody 38 has modest sail power for its displacement with an SA/D ratio of 14.98 and 59.8 m² of sail area. The Dufour 45E, with an SA/D of 18.64 and 88.0 m² of canvas, offers good sail power for versatile performance. The Dufour 45E has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1997 Moody 38 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 21.0) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.74). The Dufour 45E has a comfort ratio of 15.3 and a capsize screening value of 0.77. The ballast ratios are 38.9% for the 1997 Moody 38 and 30.5% for the Dufour 45E, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1997 Moody 38 provides 7 berths in 2 cabins with 227L of water capacity and 114L of fuel. The Dufour 45E offers 8 berths in 3 cabins with 380L water and 200L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1997 Moody 38 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The Dufour 45E has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The Dufour 45E offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1997 Moody 38 · Dufour 45E