1997 Moody 38 vs Hanse 415 — Comparison
Specifications Side by Side
| Specification | 1997 Moody 38 | Hanse 415 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Manufacturer | Moody | Hanse |
| Year | 1997–2003 | 2011–2017 |
| Type | Sloop | Sloop |
| Country | UK | Germany |
| Designer | Bill Dixon | judel/vrolijk & co |
| Dimensions | ||
| LOA | 11.58 m (38.0 ft) | 12.40 m (40.7 ft) |
| LWL | 9.60 m (31.5 ft) | 10.90 m (35.8 ft) |
| Beam | 3.72 m (12.2 ft) | 3.96 m (13.0 ft) |
| Draft | 1.37 m (4.5 ft) | 2.10 m (6.9 ft) |
| Weight | ||
| Displacement | 8,165 kg (18,001 lbs) | 8,500 kg (18,739 lbs) |
| Ballast | 3,175 kg (7,000 lbs) | 2,650 kg (5,842 lbs) |
| Sailing | ||
| Sail Area | 59.8 m² (644 ft²) | 73.0 m² (786 ft²) |
| Hull Material | Fiberglass | Fiberglass |
| Keel Type | Bilge | Fin |
| Engine & Tanks | ||
| Engine | 35 HP | 40 HP |
| Fuel Capacity | 114 L (30.1 gal) | 170 L (44.9 gal) |
| Water Capacity | 227 L (60.0 gal) | 310 L (81.9 gal) |
| Accommodation | ||
| Berths | 7 | 8 |
| Cabins | 2 | 3 |
Performance Comparison
Detailed Comparison
The 1997 Moody 38 and Hanse 415 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1997 Moody 38 is a 1990s design by Moody from UK, while the Hanse 415 is a modern offering from Hanse from Germany. The 1997 Moody 38 was penned by Bill Dixon. The Hanse 415 was designed by judel/vrolijk & co.
In terms of size, the 1997 Moody 38 measures 11.58m (38.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.72m, compared to the Hanse 415 at 12.40m (40.7ft) with a 3.96m beam. The Hanse 415 is 0.82m longer than the 1997 Moody 38. The Hanse 415 displaces approximately 4% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.
Looking at performance, the 1997 Moody 38 has modest sail power for its displacement with an SA/D ratio of 14.98 and 59.8 m² of sail area. The Hanse 415, with an SA/D of 17.81 and 73.0 m² of canvas, offers good sail power for versatile performance. The Hanse 415 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.
For comfort and safety, the 1997 Moody 38 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 21.0) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.74). The Hanse 415 has a comfort ratio of 16.2 and a capsize screening value of 0.78. The ballast ratios are 38.9% for the 1997 Moody 38 and 31.2% for the Hanse 415, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.
Below deck, the 1997 Moody 38 provides 7 berths in 2 cabins with 227L of water capacity and 114L of fuel. The Hanse 415 offers 8 berths in 3 cabins with 310L water and 170L fuel capacity.
Verdict
For cruising: The 1997 Moody 38 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.
For racing: The Hanse 415 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.
For liveaboard: The Hanse 415 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.
Compare Different Boats
Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats
Or view individual specs: 1997 Moody 38 · Hanse 415