1997 Moody 38 vs 2013 Dehler 41 — Comparison
2013 Dehler 41
Specifications Side by Side
| Specification | 1997 Moody 38 | 2013 Dehler 41 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Manufacturer | Moody | Dehler |
| Year | 1997–2003 | 2013–2019 |
| Type | Sloop | Sloop |
| Country | UK | Germany |
| Designer | Bill Dixon | Judel/Vrolijk |
| Dimensions | ||
| LOA | 11.58 m (38.0 ft) | 12.35 m (40.5 ft) |
| LWL | 9.60 m (31.5 ft) | 11.00 m (36.1 ft) |
| Beam | 3.72 m (12.2 ft) | 3.80 m (12.5 ft) |
| Draft | 1.37 m (4.5 ft) | 2.10 m (6.9 ft) |
| Weight | ||
| Displacement | 8,165 kg (18,001 lbs) | 7,800 kg (17,196 lbs) |
| Ballast | 3,175 kg (7,000 lbs) | 2,600 kg (5,732 lbs) |
| Sailing | ||
| Sail Area | 59.8 m² (644 ft²) | 74.0 m² (797 ft²) |
| Hull Material | Fiberglass | Fiberglass |
| Keel Type | Bilge | Fin |
| Engine & Tanks | ||
| Engine | 35 HP | 30 HP |
| Fuel Capacity | 114 L (30.1 gal) | 80 L (21.1 gal) |
| Water Capacity | 227 L (60.0 gal) | 170 L (44.9 gal) |
| Accommodation | ||
| Berths | 7 | 7 |
| Cabins | 2 | 3 |
Performance Comparison
Detailed Comparison
The 1997 Moody 38 and 2013 Dehler 41 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1997 Moody 38 is a 1990s design by Moody from UK, while the 2013 Dehler 41 is a modern offering from Dehler from Germany. The 1997 Moody 38 was penned by Bill Dixon. The 2013 Dehler 41 was designed by Judel/Vrolijk.
In terms of size, the 1997 Moody 38 measures 11.58m (38.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.72m, compared to the 2013 Dehler 41 at 12.35m (40.5ft) with a 3.80m beam. The 2013 Dehler 41 is 0.77m longer than the 1997 Moody 38. The 1997 Moody 38 displaces approximately 5% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.
Looking at performance, the 1997 Moody 38 has modest sail power for its displacement with an SA/D ratio of 14.98 and 59.8 m² of sail area. The 2013 Dehler 41, with an SA/D of 19.11 and 74.0 m² of canvas, offers good sail power for versatile performance. The 2013 Dehler 41 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.
For comfort and safety, the 1997 Moody 38 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 21.0) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.74). The 2013 Dehler 41 has a comfort ratio of 15.6 and a capsize screening value of 0.77. The ballast ratios are 38.9% for the 1997 Moody 38 and 33.3% for the 2013 Dehler 41, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.
Below deck, the 1997 Moody 38 provides 7 berths in 2 cabins with 227L of water capacity and 114L of fuel. The 2013 Dehler 41 offers 7 berths in 3 cabins with 170L water and 80L fuel capacity.
Verdict
For cruising: The 1997 Moody 38 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.
For racing: The 2013 Dehler 41 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.
For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.
Compare Different Boats
Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats
Or view individual specs: 1997 Moody 38 · 2013 Dehler 41