1997 Moody 38 vs 2013 Elan 350 — Comparison

1997 Moody 38
VS
2013 Elan 350

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1997 Moody 382013 Elan 350
General
ManufacturerMoodyElan
Year1997–20032013–2018
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUKSlovenia
DesignerBill DixonRob Humphreys
Dimensions
LOA11.58 m (38.0 ft)10.67 m (35.0 ft)
LWL9.60 m (31.5 ft)9.30 m (30.5 ft)
Beam3.72 m (12.2 ft)3.46 m (11.4 ft)
Draft1.37 m (4.5 ft)2.00 m (6.6 ft)
Weight
Displacement8,165 kg (18,001 lbs)6,100 kg (13,448 lbs)
Ballast3,175 kg (7,000 lbs)1,850 kg (4,079 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area59.8 m² (644 ft²)58.0 m² (624 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeBilgeFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine35 HP21 HP
Fuel Capacity114 L (30.1 gal)80 L (21.1 gal)
Water Capacity227 L (60.0 gal)170 L (44.9 gal)
Accommodation
Berths76
Cabins22

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1997 Moody 38
14.98
2013 Elan 350
17.65
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1997 Moody 38
38.89
2013 Elan 350
30.33
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1997 Moody 38
0.74
2013 Elan 350
0.76
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1997 Moody 38
20.98
2013 Elan 350
19.02

Detailed Comparison

The 1997 Moody 38 and 2013 Elan 350 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1997 Moody 38 is a 1990s design by Moody from UK, while the 2013 Elan 350 is a modern offering from Elan from Slovenia. The 1997 Moody 38 was penned by Bill Dixon. The 2013 Elan 350 was designed by Rob Humphreys.

In terms of size, the 1997 Moody 38 measures 11.58m (38.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.72m, compared to the 2013 Elan 350 at 10.67m (35.0ft) with a 3.46m beam. The 1997 Moody 38 is 0.91m longer than the 2013 Elan 350. The 1997 Moody 38 displaces approximately 34% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1997 Moody 38 has modest sail power for its displacement with an SA/D ratio of 14.98 and 59.8 m² of sail area. The 2013 Elan 350, with an SA/D of 17.65 and 58.0 m² of canvas, offers good sail power for versatile performance. The 2013 Elan 350 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1997 Moody 38 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 21.0) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.74). The 2013 Elan 350 has a comfort ratio of 19.0 and a capsize screening value of 0.76. The ballast ratios are 38.9% for the 1997 Moody 38 and 30.3% for the 2013 Elan 350, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1997 Moody 38 provides 7 berths in 2 cabins with 227L of water capacity and 114L of fuel. The 2013 Elan 350 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 170L water and 80L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1997 Moody 38 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 2013 Elan 350 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1997 Moody 38 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1997 Moody 38 · 2013 Elan 350