1997 Nautor Swan 40 vs Hunter 33 — Comparison

1997 Nautor Swan 40
VS
Hunter 33Hunter 33

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1997 Nautor Swan 40Hunter 33
General
ManufacturerNautor SwanHunter
Year1997–20021988–1994
TypeSloopSloop
CountryFinlandUSA
DesignerGerman FrersHunter Design Team
Dimensions
LOA12.30 m (40.4 ft)10.06 m (33.0 ft)
LWL10.36 m (34.0 ft)8.53 m (28.0 ft)
Beam3.85 m (12.6 ft)3.35 m (11.0 ft)
Draft2.20 m (7.2 ft)1.68 m (5.5 ft)
Weight
Displacement8,500 kg (18,739 lbs)4,763 kg (10,501 lbs)
Ballast3,600 kg (7,937 lbs)1,814 kg (3,999 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area73.5 m² (791 ft²)48.0 m² (517 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine40 HP21 HP
Fuel Capacity150 L (39.6 gal)76 L (20.1 gal)
Water Capacity250 L (66.0 gal)151 L (39.9 gal)
Accommodation
Berths66
Cabins22

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1997 Nautor Swan 40
17.93
Hunter 33
17.23
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1997 Nautor Swan 40
42.35
Hunter 33
38.09
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1997 Nautor Swan 40
0.76
Hunter 33
0.80
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1997 Nautor Swan 40
18.11
Hunter 33
18.10

Detailed Comparison

The 1997 Nautor Swan 40 and Hunter 33 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1997 Nautor Swan 40 is a 1990s design by Nautor Swan from Finland, while the Hunter 33 is a 1980s offering from Hunter from USA. The 1997 Nautor Swan 40 was penned by German Frers. The Hunter 33 was designed by Hunter Design Team.

In terms of size, the 1997 Nautor Swan 40 measures 12.30m (40.4ft) overall with a beam of 3.85m, compared to the Hunter 33 at 10.06m (33.0ft) with a 3.35m beam. The 1997 Nautor Swan 40 is 2.24m longer than the Hunter 33. The 1997 Nautor Swan 40 displaces approximately 78% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1997 Nautor Swan 40 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 17.93 and 73.5 m² of sail area. The Hunter 33, with an SA/D of 17.23 and 48.0 m² of canvas, offers good sail power for versatile performance. The 1997 Nautor Swan 40 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1997 Nautor Swan 40 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 18.1) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.76). The Hunter 33 has a comfort ratio of 18.1 and a capsize screening value of 0.80. The ballast ratios are 42.4% for the 1997 Nautor Swan 40 and 38.1% for the Hunter 33, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1997 Nautor Swan 40 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 250L of water capacity and 150L of fuel. The Hunter 33 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 151L water and 76L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1997 Nautor Swan 40 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1997 Nautor Swan 40 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1997 Nautor Swan 40 · Hunter 33