1997 Nautor Swan 40 vs 1990 Sabre 36 — Comparison

1997 Nautor Swan 40
VS
1990 Sabre 361990 Sabre 36

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1997 Nautor Swan 401990 Sabre 36
General
ManufacturerNautor SwanSabre
Year1997–20021990–1998
TypeSloopSloop
CountryFinlandUSA
DesignerGerman FrersRoger Hewson
Dimensions
LOA12.30 m (40.4 ft)10.97 m (36.0 ft)
LWL10.36 m (34.0 ft)9.14 m (30.0 ft)
Beam3.85 m (12.6 ft)3.35 m (11.0 ft)
Draft2.20 m (7.2 ft)1.60 m (5.2 ft)
Weight
Displacement8,500 kg (18,739 lbs)5,897 kg (13,001 lbs)
Ballast3,600 kg (7,937 lbs)2,449 kg (5,399 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area73.5 m² (791 ft²)52.5 m² (565 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine40 HP28 HP
Fuel Capacity150 L (39.6 gal)76 L (20.1 gal)
Water Capacity250 L (66.0 gal)151 L (39.9 gal)
Accommodation
Berths66
Cabins22

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1997 Nautor Swan 40
17.93
1990 Sabre 36
16.34
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1997 Nautor Swan 40
42.35
1990 Sabre 36
41.53
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1997 Nautor Swan 40
0.76
1990 Sabre 36
0.74
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1997 Nautor Swan 40
18.11
1990 Sabre 36
19.29

Detailed Comparison

The 1997 Nautor Swan 40 and 1990 Sabre 36 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1997 Nautor Swan 40 is a 1990s design by Nautor Swan from Finland, while the 1990 Sabre 36 is a 1990s offering from Sabre from USA. The 1997 Nautor Swan 40 was penned by German Frers. The 1990 Sabre 36 was designed by Roger Hewson.

In terms of size, the 1997 Nautor Swan 40 measures 12.30m (40.4ft) overall with a beam of 3.85m, compared to the 1990 Sabre 36 at 10.97m (36.0ft) with a 3.35m beam. The 1997 Nautor Swan 40 is 1.33m longer than the 1990 Sabre 36. The 1997 Nautor Swan 40 displaces approximately 44% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1997 Nautor Swan 40 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 17.93 and 73.5 m² of sail area. The 1990 Sabre 36, with an SA/D of 16.34 and 52.5 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 1997 Nautor Swan 40 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1997 Nautor Swan 40 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 18.1) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.76). The 1990 Sabre 36 has a comfort ratio of 19.3 and a capsize screening value of 0.74. The ballast ratios are 42.4% for the 1997 Nautor Swan 40 and 41.5% for the 1990 Sabre 36, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1997 Nautor Swan 40 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 250L of water capacity and 150L of fuel. The 1990 Sabre 36 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 151L water and 76L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1990 Sabre 36 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1997 Nautor Swan 40 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1997 Nautor Swan 40 · 1990 Sabre 36