1997 Nautor Swan 40 vs Hanse 370 — Comparison

1997 Nautor Swan 40 1997 Nautor Swan 40
VS
Hanse 370 Hanse 370

Specifications Side by Side

Specification 1997 Nautor Swan 40 Hanse 370
General
Manufacturer Nautor Swan Hanse
Year 1997–2002 2004–2008
Type Sloop Sloop
Country Finland Germany
Designer German Frers judel/vrolijk & co
Dimensions
LOA 12.30 m (40.4 ft) 11.40 m (37.4 ft)
LWL 10.36 m (34.0 ft) 10.10 m (33.1 ft)
Beam 3.85 m (12.6 ft) 3.63 m (11.9 ft)
Draft 2.20 m (7.2 ft) 1.90 m (6.2 ft)
Weight
Displacement 8,500 kg (18,739 lbs) 6,800 kg (14,991 lbs)
Ballast 3,600 kg (7,937 lbs) 2,100 kg (4,630 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area 73.5 m² (791 ft²) 60.0 m² (646 ft²)
Hull Material Fiberglass Fiberglass
Keel Type Fin Fin
Engine & Tanks
Engine 40 HP 29 HP
Fuel Capacity 150 L (39.6 gal) 130 L (34.3 gal)
Water Capacity 250 L (66.0 gal) 250 L (66.0 gal)
Accommodation
Berths 6 6
Cabins 2 2

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1997 Nautor Swan 40
17.93
Hanse 370
16.98
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1997 Nautor Swan 40
42.35
Hanse 370
30.88
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1997 Nautor Swan 40
0.76
Hanse 370
0.77
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1997 Nautor Swan 40
18.11
Hanse 370
17.05

Detailed Comparison

The 1997 Nautor Swan 40 and Hanse 370 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1997 Nautor Swan 40 is a 1990s design by Nautor Swan from Finland, while the Hanse 370 is a 2000s offering from Hanse from Germany. The 1997 Nautor Swan 40 was penned by German Frers. The Hanse 370 was designed by judel/vrolijk & co.

In terms of size, the 1997 Nautor Swan 40 measures 12.30m (40.4ft) overall with a beam of 3.85m, compared to the Hanse 370 at 11.40m (37.4ft) with a 3.63m beam. The 1997 Nautor Swan 40 is 0.90m longer than the Hanse 370. The 1997 Nautor Swan 40 displaces approximately 25% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1997 Nautor Swan 40 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 17.93 and 73.5 m² of sail area. The Hanse 370, with an SA/D of 16.98 and 60.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 1997 Nautor Swan 40 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1997 Nautor Swan 40 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 18.1) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.76). The Hanse 370 has a comfort ratio of 17.1 and a capsize screening value of 0.77. The ballast ratios are 42.4% for the 1997 Nautor Swan 40 and 30.9% for the Hanse 370, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1997 Nautor Swan 40 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 250L of water capacity and 150L of fuel. The Hanse 370 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 250L water and 130L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1997 Nautor Swan 40 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1997 Nautor Swan 40 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

VS