1997 Nautor Swan 40 vs Beneteau Oceanis 38.1 — Comparison

1997 Nautor Swan 40
VS
Beneteau Oceanis 38.1Beneteau Oceanis 38.1

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1997 Nautor Swan 40Beneteau Oceanis 38.1
General
ManufacturerNautor SwanBeneteau
Year1997–20022017
TypeSloopSloop
CountryFinlandFrance
DesignerGerman FrersMarc Lombard
Dimensions
LOA12.30 m (40.4 ft)11.50 m (37.7 ft)
LWL10.36 m (34.0 ft)10.47 m (34.4 ft)
Beam3.85 m (12.6 ft)3.72 m (12.2 ft)
Draft2.20 m (7.2 ft)2.08 m (6.8 ft)
Weight
Displacement8,500 kg (18,739 lbs)7,150 kg (15,763 lbs)
Ballast3,600 kg (7,937 lbs)2,200 kg (4,850 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area73.5 m² (791 ft²)62.5 m² (673 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine40 HP29 HP
Fuel Capacity150 L (39.6 gal)140 L (37.0 gal)
Water Capacity250 L (66.0 gal)250 L (66.0 gal)
Accommodation
Berths66
Cabins22

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1997 Nautor Swan 40
17.93
Beneteau Oceanis 38.1
17.11
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1997 Nautor Swan 40
42.35
Beneteau Oceanis 38.1
30.77
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1997 Nautor Swan 40
0.76
Beneteau Oceanis 38.1
0.77
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1997 Nautor Swan 40
18.11
Beneteau Oceanis 38.1
16.43

Detailed Comparison

The 1997 Nautor Swan 40 and Beneteau Oceanis 38.1 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1997 Nautor Swan 40 is a 1990s design by Nautor Swan from Finland, while the Beneteau Oceanis 38.1 is a modern offering from Beneteau from France. The 1997 Nautor Swan 40 was penned by German Frers. The Beneteau Oceanis 38.1 was designed by Marc Lombard.

In terms of size, the 1997 Nautor Swan 40 measures 12.30m (40.4ft) overall with a beam of 3.85m, compared to the Beneteau Oceanis 38.1 at 11.50m (37.7ft) with a 3.72m beam. The 1997 Nautor Swan 40 is 0.80m longer than the Beneteau Oceanis 38.1. The 1997 Nautor Swan 40 displaces approximately 19% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1997 Nautor Swan 40 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 17.93 and 73.5 m² of sail area. The Beneteau Oceanis 38.1, with an SA/D of 17.11 and 62.5 m² of canvas, offers good sail power for versatile performance. The 1997 Nautor Swan 40 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1997 Nautor Swan 40 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 18.1) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.76). The Beneteau Oceanis 38.1 has a comfort ratio of 16.4 and a capsize screening value of 0.77. The ballast ratios are 42.4% for the 1997 Nautor Swan 40 and 30.8% for the Beneteau Oceanis 38.1, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1997 Nautor Swan 40 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 250L of water capacity and 150L of fuel. The Beneteau Oceanis 38.1 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 250L water and 140L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1997 Nautor Swan 40 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1997 Nautor Swan 40 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1997 Nautor Swan 40 · Beneteau Oceanis 38.1