Bavaria 34 vs 1992 Moody 41 — Comparison

Bavaria 34Bavaria 34
VS
1992 Moody 411992 Moody 41

Specifications Side by Side

SpecificationBavaria 341992 Moody 41
General
ManufacturerBavariaMoody
Year1998–20041992–1998
TypeSloopSloop
CountryGermanyUK
DesignerJ&J DesignBill Dixon
Dimensions
LOA10.35 m (34.0 ft)12.50 m (41.0 ft)
LWL9.10 m (29.9 ft)10.36 m (34.0 ft)
Beam3.38 m (11.1 ft)3.86 m (12.7 ft)
Draft1.80 m (5.9 ft)1.70 m (5.6 ft)
Weight
Displacement5,200 kg (11,464 lbs)9,800 kg (21,605 lbs)
Ballast1,700 kg (3,748 lbs)3,800 kg (8,378 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area52.0 m² (560 ft²)70.0 m² (754 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine18 HP40 HP
Fuel Capacity80 L (21.1 gal)180 L (47.6 gal)
Water Capacity170 L (44.9 gal)360 L (95.1 gal)
Accommodation
Berths67
Cabins23

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
Bavaria 34
17.60
1992 Moody 41
15.53
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
Bavaria 34
32.69
1992 Moody 41
38.78
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
Bavaria 34
0.78
1992 Moody 41
0.72
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
Bavaria 34
17.57
1992 Moody 41
20.58

Detailed Comparison

The Bavaria 34 and 1992 Moody 41 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The Bavaria 34 is a 1990s design by Bavaria from Germany, while the 1992 Moody 41 is a 1990s offering from Moody from UK. The Bavaria 34 was penned by J&J Design. The 1992 Moody 41 was designed by Bill Dixon.

In terms of size, the Bavaria 34 measures 10.35m (34.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.38m, compared to the 1992 Moody 41 at 12.50m (41.0ft) with a 3.86m beam. The 1992 Moody 41 is 2.15m longer than the Bavaria 34. The 1992 Moody 41 displaces approximately 88% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the Bavaria 34 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 17.60 and 52.0 m² of sail area. The 1992 Moody 41, with an SA/D of 15.53 and 70.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The Bavaria 34 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the Bavaria 34 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 17.6) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.78). The 1992 Moody 41 has a comfort ratio of 20.6 and a capsize screening value of 0.72. The ballast ratios are 32.7% for the Bavaria 34 and 38.8% for the 1992 Moody 41, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the Bavaria 34 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 170L of water capacity and 80L of fuel. The 1992 Moody 41 offers 7 berths in 3 cabins with 360L water and 180L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1992 Moody 41 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The Bavaria 34 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1992 Moody 41 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: Bavaria 34 · 1992 Moody 41