1998 Beneteau Oceanis 36 CC vs 1978 Cape Dory 270 — Comparison

1998 Beneteau Oceanis 36 CC1998 Beneteau Oceanis 36 CC
VS
1978 Cape Dory 270

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1998 Beneteau Oceanis 36 CC1978 Cape Dory 270
General
ManufacturerBeneteauCape Dory
Year1998–20031978–1985
TypeSloopSloop
CountryFranceUSA
DesignerGroupe FinotCarl Alberg
Dimensions
LOA10.97 m (36.0 ft)8.23 m (27.0 ft)
LWL9.45 m (31.0 ft)6.40 m (21.0 ft)
Beam3.65 m (12.0 ft)2.59 m (8.5 ft)
Draft1.68 m (5.5 ft)1.14 m (3.7 ft)
Weight
Displacement7,100 kg (15,653 lbs)2,722 kg (6,001 lbs)
Ballast2,500 kg (5,512 lbs)1,134 kg (2,500 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area59.0 m² (635 ft²)28.0 m² (301 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFull
Engine & Tanks
Engine28 HP12 HP
Fuel Capacity100 L (26.4 gal)38 L (10.0 gal)
Water Capacity200 L (52.8 gal)68 L (18.0 gal)
Accommodation
Berths74
Cabins21

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1998 Beneteau Oceanis 36 CC
16.23
1978 Cape Dory 270
14.60
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1998 Beneteau Oceanis 36 CC
35.21
1978 Cape Dory 270
41.66
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1998 Beneteau Oceanis 36 CC
0.76
1978 Cape Dory 270
0.74
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1998 Beneteau Oceanis 36 CC
19.82
1978 Cape Dory 270
24.39

Detailed Comparison

The 1998 Beneteau Oceanis 36 CC and 1978 Cape Dory 270 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1998 Beneteau Oceanis 36 CC is a 1990s design by Beneteau from France, while the 1978 Cape Dory 270 is a 1970s offering from Cape Dory from USA. The 1998 Beneteau Oceanis 36 CC was penned by Groupe Finot. The 1978 Cape Dory 270 was designed by Carl Alberg.

In terms of size, the 1998 Beneteau Oceanis 36 CC measures 10.97m (36.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.65m, compared to the 1978 Cape Dory 270 at 8.23m (27.0ft) with a 2.59m beam. The 1998 Beneteau Oceanis 36 CC is 2.74m longer than the 1978 Cape Dory 270. The 1998 Beneteau Oceanis 36 CC displaces approximately 161% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1998 Beneteau Oceanis 36 CC has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.23 and 59.0 m² of sail area. The 1978 Cape Dory 270, with an SA/D of 14.60 and 28.0 m² of canvas, offers modest sail power for its displacement. The 1998 Beneteau Oceanis 36 CC has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1998 Beneteau Oceanis 36 CC offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 19.8) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.76). The 1978 Cape Dory 270 has a comfort ratio of 24.4 and a capsize screening value of 0.74. The ballast ratios are 35.2% for the 1998 Beneteau Oceanis 36 CC and 41.7% for the 1978 Cape Dory 270, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1998 Beneteau Oceanis 36 CC provides 7 berths in 2 cabins with 200L of water capacity and 100L of fuel. The 1978 Cape Dory 270 offers 4 berths in 1 cabin with 68L water and 38L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1978 Cape Dory 270 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1998 Beneteau Oceanis 36 CC has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1998 Beneteau Oceanis 36 CC offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1998 Beneteau Oceanis 36 CC · 1978 Cape Dory 270