1998 Beneteau Oceanis 36 CC vs 1982 Westerly Konsort — Comparison
1998 Beneteau Oceanis 36 CC
1982 Westerly Konsort
Specifications Side by Side
| Specification | 1998 Beneteau Oceanis 36 CC | 1982 Westerly Konsort |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Manufacturer | Beneteau | Westerly |
| Year | 1998–2003 | 1982–1990 |
| Type | Sloop | Sloop |
| Country | France | UK |
| Designer | Groupe Finot | Ed Dubois |
| Dimensions | ||
| LOA | 10.97 m (36.0 ft) | 9.50 m (31.2 ft) |
| LWL | 9.45 m (31.0 ft) | 7.70 m (25.3 ft) |
| Beam | 3.65 m (12.0 ft) | 3.10 m (10.2 ft) |
| Draft | 1.68 m (5.5 ft) | 1.07 m (3.5 ft) |
| Weight | ||
| Displacement | 7,100 kg (15,653 lbs) | 4,536 kg (10,000 lbs) |
| Ballast | 2,500 kg (5,512 lbs) | 1,633 kg (3,600 lbs) |
| Sailing | ||
| Sail Area | 59.0 m² (635 ft²) | 34.0 m² (366 ft²) |
| Hull Material | Fiberglass | Fiberglass |
| Keel Type | Fin | Bilge |
| Engine & Tanks | ||
| Engine | 28 HP | 15 HP |
| Fuel Capacity | 100 L (26.4 gal) | 68 L (18.0 gal) |
| Water Capacity | 200 L (52.8 gal) | 114 L (30.1 gal) |
| Accommodation | ||
| Berths | 7 | 6 |
| Cabins | 2 | 2 |
Performance Comparison
Detailed Comparison
The 1998 Beneteau Oceanis 36 CC and 1982 Westerly Konsort represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1998 Beneteau Oceanis 36 CC is a 1990s design by Beneteau from France, while the 1982 Westerly Konsort is a 1980s offering from Westerly from UK. The 1998 Beneteau Oceanis 36 CC was penned by Groupe Finot. The 1982 Westerly Konsort was designed by Ed Dubois.
In terms of size, the 1998 Beneteau Oceanis 36 CC measures 10.97m (36.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.65m, compared to the 1982 Westerly Konsort at 9.50m (31.2ft) with a 3.10m beam. The 1998 Beneteau Oceanis 36 CC is 1.47m longer than the 1982 Westerly Konsort. The 1998 Beneteau Oceanis 36 CC displaces approximately 57% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.
Looking at performance, the 1998 Beneteau Oceanis 36 CC has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.23 and 59.0 m² of sail area. The 1982 Westerly Konsort, with an SA/D of 12.61 and 34.0 m² of canvas, offers modest sail power for its displacement. The 1998 Beneteau Oceanis 36 CC has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.
For comfort and safety, the 1998 Beneteau Oceanis 36 CC offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 19.8) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.76). The 1982 Westerly Konsort has a comfort ratio of 22.8 and a capsize screening value of 0.75. The ballast ratios are 35.2% for the 1998 Beneteau Oceanis 36 CC and 36.0% for the 1982 Westerly Konsort, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.
Below deck, the 1998 Beneteau Oceanis 36 CC provides 7 berths in 2 cabins with 200L of water capacity and 100L of fuel. The 1982 Westerly Konsort offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 114L water and 68L fuel capacity.
Verdict
For cruising: The 1982 Westerly Konsort is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.
For racing: The 1998 Beneteau Oceanis 36 CC has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.
For liveaboard: The 1998 Beneteau Oceanis 36 CC offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.