1998 Beneteau Oceanis 36 CC vs 1992 Moody 41 — Comparison

1998 Beneteau Oceanis 36 CC1998 Beneteau Oceanis 36 CC
VS
1992 Moody 411992 Moody 41

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1998 Beneteau Oceanis 36 CC1992 Moody 41
General
ManufacturerBeneteauMoody
Year1998–20031992–1998
TypeSloopSloop
CountryFranceUK
DesignerGroupe FinotBill Dixon
Dimensions
LOA10.97 m (36.0 ft)12.50 m (41.0 ft)
LWL9.45 m (31.0 ft)10.36 m (34.0 ft)
Beam3.65 m (12.0 ft)3.86 m (12.7 ft)
Draft1.68 m (5.5 ft)1.70 m (5.6 ft)
Weight
Displacement7,100 kg (15,653 lbs)9,800 kg (21,605 lbs)
Ballast2,500 kg (5,512 lbs)3,800 kg (8,378 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area59.0 m² (635 ft²)70.0 m² (754 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine28 HP40 HP
Fuel Capacity100 L (26.4 gal)180 L (47.6 gal)
Water Capacity200 L (52.8 gal)360 L (95.1 gal)
Accommodation
Berths77
Cabins23

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1998 Beneteau Oceanis 36 CC
16.23
1992 Moody 41
15.53
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1998 Beneteau Oceanis 36 CC
35.21
1992 Moody 41
38.78
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1998 Beneteau Oceanis 36 CC
0.76
1992 Moody 41
0.72
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1998 Beneteau Oceanis 36 CC
19.82
1992 Moody 41
20.58

Detailed Comparison

The 1998 Beneteau Oceanis 36 CC and 1992 Moody 41 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1998 Beneteau Oceanis 36 CC is a 1990s design by Beneteau from France, while the 1992 Moody 41 is a 1990s offering from Moody from UK. The 1998 Beneteau Oceanis 36 CC was penned by Groupe Finot. The 1992 Moody 41 was designed by Bill Dixon.

In terms of size, the 1998 Beneteau Oceanis 36 CC measures 10.97m (36.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.65m, compared to the 1992 Moody 41 at 12.50m (41.0ft) with a 3.86m beam. The 1992 Moody 41 is 1.53m longer than the 1998 Beneteau Oceanis 36 CC. The 1992 Moody 41 displaces approximately 38% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1998 Beneteau Oceanis 36 CC has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.23 and 59.0 m² of sail area. The 1992 Moody 41, with an SA/D of 15.53 and 70.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 1998 Beneteau Oceanis 36 CC has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1998 Beneteau Oceanis 36 CC offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 19.8) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.76). The 1992 Moody 41 has a comfort ratio of 20.6 and a capsize screening value of 0.72. The ballast ratios are 35.2% for the 1998 Beneteau Oceanis 36 CC and 38.8% for the 1992 Moody 41, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1998 Beneteau Oceanis 36 CC provides 7 berths in 2 cabins with 200L of water capacity and 100L of fuel. The 1992 Moody 41 offers 7 berths in 3 cabins with 360L water and 180L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1992 Moody 41 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1998 Beneteau Oceanis 36 CC has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1998 Beneteau Oceanis 36 CC · 1992 Moody 41