1998 Beneteau Oceanis 36 CC vs 2003 Sabre 402 — Comparison

1998 Beneteau Oceanis 36 CC1998 Beneteau Oceanis 36 CC
VS
2003 Sabre 402

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1998 Beneteau Oceanis 36 CC2003 Sabre 402
General
ManufacturerBeneteauSabre
Year1998–20032003–2010
TypeSloopSloop
CountryFranceUSA
DesignerGroupe FinotJim Taylor
Dimensions
LOA10.97 m (36.0 ft)12.19 m (40.0 ft)
LWL9.45 m (31.0 ft)10.36 m (34.0 ft)
Beam3.65 m (12.0 ft)3.72 m (12.2 ft)
Draft1.68 m (5.5 ft)1.83 m (6.0 ft)
Weight
Displacement7,100 kg (15,653 lbs)8,165 kg (18,001 lbs)
Ballast2,500 kg (5,512 lbs)3,266 kg (7,200 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area59.0 m² (635 ft²)66.0 m² (710 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine28 HP40 HP
Fuel Capacity100 L (26.4 gal)151 L (39.9 gal)
Water Capacity200 L (52.8 gal)227 L (60.0 gal)
Accommodation
Berths77
Cabins22

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1998 Beneteau Oceanis 36 CC
16.23
2003 Sabre 402
16.54
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1998 Beneteau Oceanis 36 CC
35.21
2003 Sabre 402
40.00
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1998 Beneteau Oceanis 36 CC
0.76
2003 Sabre 402
0.74
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1998 Beneteau Oceanis 36 CC
19.82
2003 Sabre 402
18.32

Detailed Comparison

The 1998 Beneteau Oceanis 36 CC and 2003 Sabre 402 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1998 Beneteau Oceanis 36 CC is a 1990s design by Beneteau from France, while the 2003 Sabre 402 is a 2000s offering from Sabre from USA. The 1998 Beneteau Oceanis 36 CC was penned by Groupe Finot. The 2003 Sabre 402 was designed by Jim Taylor.

In terms of size, the 1998 Beneteau Oceanis 36 CC measures 10.97m (36.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.65m, compared to the 2003 Sabre 402 at 12.19m (40.0ft) with a 3.72m beam. The 2003 Sabre 402 is 1.22m longer than the 1998 Beneteau Oceanis 36 CC. The 2003 Sabre 402 displaces approximately 15% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1998 Beneteau Oceanis 36 CC has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.23 and 59.0 m² of sail area. The 2003 Sabre 402, with an SA/D of 16.54 and 66.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 2003 Sabre 402 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1998 Beneteau Oceanis 36 CC offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 19.8) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.76). The 2003 Sabre 402 has a comfort ratio of 18.3 and a capsize screening value of 0.74. The ballast ratios are 35.2% for the 1998 Beneteau Oceanis 36 CC and 40.0% for the 2003 Sabre 402, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1998 Beneteau Oceanis 36 CC provides 7 berths in 2 cabins with 200L of water capacity and 100L of fuel. The 2003 Sabre 402 offers 7 berths in 2 cabins with 227L water and 151L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1998 Beneteau Oceanis 36 CC is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 2003 Sabre 402 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1998 Beneteau Oceanis 36 CC · 2003 Sabre 402