Catalina 28 vs 1990 Sabre 36 — Comparison

Catalina 28Catalina 28
VS
1990 Sabre 361990 Sabre 36

Specifications Side by Side

SpecificationCatalina 281990 Sabre 36
General
ManufacturerCatalinaSabre
Year1998–20041990–1998
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSAUSA
DesignerGerry DouglasRoger Hewson
Dimensions
LOA8.69 m (28.5 ft)10.97 m (36.0 ft)
LWL7.62 m (25.0 ft)9.14 m (30.0 ft)
Beam2.90 m (9.5 ft)3.35 m (11.0 ft)
Draft1.37 m (4.5 ft)1.60 m (5.2 ft)
Weight
Displacement2,812 kg (6,199 lbs)5,897 kg (13,001 lbs)
Ballast1,134 kg (2,500 lbs)2,449 kg (5,399 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area33.5 m² (361 ft²)52.5 m² (565 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine15 HP28 HP
Fuel Capacity57 L (15.1 gal)76 L (20.1 gal)
Water Capacity95 L (25.1 gal)151 L (39.9 gal)
Accommodation
Berths66
Cabins12

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
Catalina 28
17.09
1990 Sabre 36
16.34
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
Catalina 28
40.33
1990 Sabre 36
41.53
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
Catalina 28
0.82
1990 Sabre 36
0.74
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
Catalina 28
16.59
1990 Sabre 36
19.29

Detailed Comparison

The Catalina 28 and 1990 Sabre 36 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The Catalina 28 is a 1990s design by Catalina from USA, while the 1990 Sabre 36 is a 1990s offering from Sabre from USA. The Catalina 28 was penned by Gerry Douglas. The 1990 Sabre 36 was designed by Roger Hewson.

In terms of size, the Catalina 28 measures 8.69m (28.5ft) overall with a beam of 2.90m, compared to the 1990 Sabre 36 at 10.97m (36.0ft) with a 3.35m beam. The 1990 Sabre 36 is 2.28m longer than the Catalina 28. The 1990 Sabre 36 displaces approximately 110% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the Catalina 28 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 17.09 and 33.5 m² of sail area. The 1990 Sabre 36, with an SA/D of 16.34 and 52.5 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The Catalina 28 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the Catalina 28 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 16.6) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.82). The 1990 Sabre 36 has a comfort ratio of 19.3 and a capsize screening value of 0.74. The ballast ratios are 40.3% for the Catalina 28 and 41.5% for the 1990 Sabre 36, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the Catalina 28 provides 6 berths in 1 cabin with 95L of water capacity and 57L of fuel. The 1990 Sabre 36 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 151L water and 76L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1990 Sabre 36 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The Catalina 28 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: Catalina 28 · 1990 Sabre 36