1998 Catalina 42 vs 1977 Cal 33 — Comparison

1998 Catalina 421998 Catalina 42
VS
1977 Cal 33

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1998 Catalina 421977 Cal 33
General
ManufacturerCatalinaCal
Year1998–20041977–1982
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSAUSA
DesignerGerry DouglasBill Lapworth / C. Raymond Hunt
Dimensions
LOA12.80 m (42.0 ft)10.06 m (33.0 ft)
LWL10.82 m (35.5 ft)8.08 m (26.5 ft)
Beam3.96 m (13.0 ft)3.20 m (10.5 ft)
Draft1.83 m (6.0 ft)1.60 m (5.2 ft)
Weight
Displacement9,525 kg (20,999 lbs)5,216 kg (11,499 lbs)
Ballast3,856 kg (8,501 lbs)2,177 kg (4,799 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area72.5 m² (780 ft²)43.0 m² (463 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine40 HP18 HP
Fuel Capacity151 L (39.9 gal)68 L (18.0 gal)
Water Capacity303 L (80.0 gal)114 L (30.1 gal)
Accommodation
Berths86
Cabins32

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1998 Catalina 42
16.39
1977 Cal 33
14.53
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1998 Catalina 42
40.48
1977 Cal 33
41.74
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1998 Catalina 42
0.75
1977 Cal 33
0.74
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1998 Catalina 42
17.96
1977 Cal 33
22.63

Detailed Comparison

The 1998 Catalina 42 and 1977 Cal 33 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1998 Catalina 42 is a 1990s design by Catalina from USA, while the 1977 Cal 33 is a 1970s offering from Cal from USA. The 1998 Catalina 42 was penned by Gerry Douglas. The 1977 Cal 33 was designed by Bill Lapworth / C. Raymond Hunt.

In terms of size, the 1998 Catalina 42 measures 12.80m (42.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.96m, compared to the 1977 Cal 33 at 10.06m (33.0ft) with a 3.20m beam. The 1998 Catalina 42 is 2.74m longer than the 1977 Cal 33. The 1998 Catalina 42 displaces approximately 83% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1998 Catalina 42 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.39 and 72.5 m² of sail area. The 1977 Cal 33, with an SA/D of 14.53 and 43.0 m² of canvas, offers modest sail power for its displacement. The 1998 Catalina 42 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1998 Catalina 42 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 18.0) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.75). The 1977 Cal 33 has a comfort ratio of 22.6 and a capsize screening value of 0.74. The ballast ratios are 40.5% for the 1998 Catalina 42 and 41.7% for the 1977 Cal 33, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1998 Catalina 42 provides 8 berths in 3 cabins with 303L of water capacity and 151L of fuel. The 1977 Cal 33 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 114L water and 68L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1977 Cal 33 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1998 Catalina 42 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1998 Catalina 42 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1998 Catalina 42 · 1977 Cal 33