1998 Catalina 42 vs 1991 Westerly Seahawk — Comparison

1998 Catalina 421998 Catalina 42
VS
1991 Westerly Seahawk1991 Westerly Seahawk

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1998 Catalina 421991 Westerly Seahawk
General
ManufacturerCatalinaWesterly
Year1998–20041991–1997
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSAUK
DesignerGerry DouglasEd Dubois
Dimensions
LOA12.80 m (42.0 ft)10.36 m (34.0 ft)
LWL10.82 m (35.5 ft)8.53 m (28.0 ft)
Beam3.96 m (13.0 ft)3.35 m (11.0 ft)
Draft1.83 m (6.0 ft)1.80 m (5.9 ft)
Weight
Displacement9,525 kg (20,999 lbs)6,123 kg (13,499 lbs)
Ballast3,856 kg (8,501 lbs)2,495 kg (5,501 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area72.5 m² (780 ft²)48.0 m² (517 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine40 HP28 HP
Fuel Capacity151 L (39.9 gal)114 L (30.1 gal)
Water Capacity303 L (80.0 gal)220 L (58.1 gal)
Accommodation
Berths87
Cabins33

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1998 Catalina 42
16.39
1991 Westerly Seahawk
14.57
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1998 Catalina 42
40.48
1991 Westerly Seahawk
40.75
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1998 Catalina 42
0.75
1991 Westerly Seahawk
0.73
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1998 Catalina 42
17.96
1991 Westerly Seahawk
22.81

Detailed Comparison

The 1998 Catalina 42 and 1991 Westerly Seahawk represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1998 Catalina 42 is a 1990s design by Catalina from USA, while the 1991 Westerly Seahawk is a 1990s offering from Westerly from UK. The 1998 Catalina 42 was penned by Gerry Douglas. The 1991 Westerly Seahawk was designed by Ed Dubois.

In terms of size, the 1998 Catalina 42 measures 12.80m (42.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.96m, compared to the 1991 Westerly Seahawk at 10.36m (34.0ft) with a 3.35m beam. The 1998 Catalina 42 is 2.44m longer than the 1991 Westerly Seahawk. The 1998 Catalina 42 displaces approximately 56% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1998 Catalina 42 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.39 and 72.5 m² of sail area. The 1991 Westerly Seahawk, with an SA/D of 14.57 and 48.0 m² of canvas, offers modest sail power for its displacement. The 1998 Catalina 42 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1998 Catalina 42 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 18.0) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.75). The 1991 Westerly Seahawk has a comfort ratio of 22.8 and a capsize screening value of 0.73. The ballast ratios are 40.5% for the 1998 Catalina 42 and 40.8% for the 1991 Westerly Seahawk, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1998 Catalina 42 provides 8 berths in 3 cabins with 303L of water capacity and 151L of fuel. The 1991 Westerly Seahawk offers 7 berths in 3 cabins with 220L water and 114L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1991 Westerly Seahawk is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1998 Catalina 42 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1998 Catalina 42 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1998 Catalina 42 · 1991 Westerly Seahawk