1998 Catalina 42 vs 2010 X-Yachts Xc 35 — Comparison

1998 Catalina 421998 Catalina 42
VS
2010 X-Yachts Xc 35

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1998 Catalina 422010 X-Yachts Xc 35
General
ManufacturerCatalinaX-Yachts
Year1998–20042010–2016
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSADenmark
DesignerGerry DouglasNiels Jeppesen
Dimensions
LOA12.80 m (42.0 ft)10.57 m (34.7 ft)
LWL10.82 m (35.5 ft)9.20 m (30.2 ft)
Beam3.96 m (13.0 ft)3.35 m (11.0 ft)
Draft1.83 m (6.0 ft)1.80 m (5.9 ft)
Weight
Displacement9,525 kg (20,999 lbs)5,800 kg (12,787 lbs)
Ballast3,856 kg (8,501 lbs)2,100 kg (4,630 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area72.5 m² (780 ft²)52.0 m² (560 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine40 HP21 HP
Fuel Capacity151 L (39.9 gal)70 L (18.5 gal)
Water Capacity303 L (80.0 gal)140 L (37.0 gal)
Accommodation
Berths86
Cabins32

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1998 Catalina 42
16.39
2010 X-Yachts Xc 35
16.37
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1998 Catalina 42
40.48
2010 X-Yachts Xc 35
36.21
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1998 Catalina 42
0.75
2010 X-Yachts Xc 35
0.75
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1998 Catalina 42
17.96
2010 X-Yachts Xc 35
19.28

Detailed Comparison

The 1998 Catalina 42 and 2010 X-Yachts Xc 35 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1998 Catalina 42 is a 1990s design by Catalina from USA, while the 2010 X-Yachts Xc 35 is a modern offering from X-Yachts from Denmark. The 1998 Catalina 42 was penned by Gerry Douglas. The 2010 X-Yachts Xc 35 was designed by Niels Jeppesen.

In terms of size, the 1998 Catalina 42 measures 12.80m (42.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.96m, compared to the 2010 X-Yachts Xc 35 at 10.57m (34.7ft) with a 3.35m beam. The 1998 Catalina 42 is 2.23m longer than the 2010 X-Yachts Xc 35. The 1998 Catalina 42 displaces approximately 64% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1998 Catalina 42 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.39 and 72.5 m² of sail area. The 2010 X-Yachts Xc 35, with an SA/D of 16.37 and 52.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 1998 Catalina 42 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1998 Catalina 42 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 18.0) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.75). The 2010 X-Yachts Xc 35 has a comfort ratio of 19.3 and a capsize screening value of 0.75. The ballast ratios are 40.5% for the 1998 Catalina 42 and 36.2% for the 2010 X-Yachts Xc 35, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1998 Catalina 42 provides 8 berths in 3 cabins with 303L of water capacity and 151L of fuel. The 2010 X-Yachts Xc 35 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 140L water and 70L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 2010 X-Yachts Xc 35 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1998 Catalina 42 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1998 Catalina 42 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1998 Catalina 42 · 2010 X-Yachts Xc 35