1998 Catalina 42 vs 2014 Elan 400 — Comparison

1998 Catalina 421998 Catalina 42
VS
2014 Elan 4002014 Elan 400

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1998 Catalina 422014 Elan 400
General
ManufacturerCatalinaElan
Year1998–20042014–2018
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSASlovenia
DesignerGerry DouglasRob Humphreys
Dimensions
LOA12.80 m (42.0 ft)12.07 m (39.6 ft)
LWL10.82 m (35.5 ft)10.50 m (34.4 ft)
Beam3.96 m (13.0 ft)3.90 m (12.8 ft)
Draft1.83 m (6.0 ft)2.10 m (6.9 ft)
Weight
Displacement9,525 kg (20,999 lbs)8,200 kg (18,078 lbs)
Ballast3,856 kg (8,501 lbs)2,600 kg (5,732 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area72.5 m² (780 ft²)76.0 m² (818 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine40 HP30 HP
Fuel Capacity151 L (39.9 gal)120 L (31.7 gal)
Water Capacity303 L (80.0 gal)250 L (66.0 gal)
Accommodation
Berths87
Cabins33

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1998 Catalina 42
16.39
2014 Elan 400
18.99
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1998 Catalina 42
40.48
2014 Elan 400
31.71
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1998 Catalina 42
0.75
2014 Elan 400
0.77
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1998 Catalina 42
17.96
2014 Elan 400
17.08

Detailed Comparison

The 1998 Catalina 42 and 2014 Elan 400 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1998 Catalina 42 is a 1990s design by Catalina from USA, while the 2014 Elan 400 is a modern offering from Elan from Slovenia. The 1998 Catalina 42 was penned by Gerry Douglas. The 2014 Elan 400 was designed by Rob Humphreys.

In terms of size, the 1998 Catalina 42 measures 12.80m (42.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.96m, compared to the 2014 Elan 400 at 12.07m (39.6ft) with a 3.90m beam. The 1998 Catalina 42 is 0.73m longer than the 2014 Elan 400. The 1998 Catalina 42 displaces approximately 16% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1998 Catalina 42 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.39 and 72.5 m² of sail area. The 2014 Elan 400, with an SA/D of 18.99 and 76.0 m² of canvas, offers good sail power for versatile performance. The 2014 Elan 400 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1998 Catalina 42 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 18.0) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.75). The 2014 Elan 400 has a comfort ratio of 17.1 and a capsize screening value of 0.77. The ballast ratios are 40.5% for the 1998 Catalina 42 and 31.7% for the 2014 Elan 400, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1998 Catalina 42 provides 8 berths in 3 cabins with 303L of water capacity and 151L of fuel. The 2014 Elan 400 offers 7 berths in 3 cabins with 250L water and 120L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1998 Catalina 42 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 2014 Elan 400 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1998 Catalina 42 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1998 Catalina 42 · 2014 Elan 400