1998 Dehler 29 vs 1990 Sabre 36 — Comparison

1998 Dehler 29
VS
1990 Sabre 361990 Sabre 36

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1998 Dehler 291990 Sabre 36
General
ManufacturerDehlerSabre
Year1998–20061990–1998
TypeSloopSloop
CountryGermanyUSA
DesignerJudel/VrolijkRoger Hewson
Dimensions
LOA8.82 m (28.9 ft)10.97 m (36.0 ft)
LWL7.60 m (24.9 ft)9.14 m (30.0 ft)
Beam2.95 m (9.7 ft)3.35 m (11.0 ft)
Draft1.55 m (5.1 ft)1.60 m (5.2 ft)
Weight
Displacement3,200 kg (7,055 lbs)5,897 kg (13,001 lbs)
Ballast1,200 kg (2,646 lbs)2,449 kg (5,399 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area35.0 m² (377 ft²)52.5 m² (565 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine14 HP28 HP
Fuel Capacity40 L (10.6 gal)76 L (20.1 gal)
Water Capacity80 L (21.1 gal)151 L (39.9 gal)
Accommodation
Berths56
Cabins22

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1998 Dehler 29
16.38
1990 Sabre 36
16.34
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1998 Dehler 29
37.50
1990 Sabre 36
41.53
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1998 Dehler 29
0.80
1990 Sabre 36
0.74
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1998 Dehler 29
18.34
1990 Sabre 36
19.29

Detailed Comparison

The 1998 Dehler 29 and 1990 Sabre 36 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1998 Dehler 29 is a 1990s design by Dehler from Germany, while the 1990 Sabre 36 is a 1990s offering from Sabre from USA. The 1998 Dehler 29 was penned by Judel/Vrolijk. The 1990 Sabre 36 was designed by Roger Hewson.

In terms of size, the 1998 Dehler 29 measures 8.82m (28.9ft) overall with a beam of 2.95m, compared to the 1990 Sabre 36 at 10.97m (36.0ft) with a 3.35m beam. The 1990 Sabre 36 is 2.15m longer than the 1998 Dehler 29. The 1990 Sabre 36 displaces approximately 84% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1998 Dehler 29 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.38 and 35.0 m² of sail area. The 1990 Sabre 36, with an SA/D of 16.34 and 52.5 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 1998 Dehler 29 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1998 Dehler 29 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 18.3) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.80). The 1990 Sabre 36 has a comfort ratio of 19.3 and a capsize screening value of 0.74. The ballast ratios are 37.5% for the 1998 Dehler 29 and 41.5% for the 1990 Sabre 36, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1998 Dehler 29 provides 5 berths in 2 cabins with 80L of water capacity and 40L of fuel. The 1990 Sabre 36 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 151L water and 76L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1990 Sabre 36 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1998 Dehler 29 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1990 Sabre 36 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1998 Dehler 29 · 1990 Sabre 36