1998 Feeling 44 vs 1979 Cal 39 — Comparison

1998 Feeling 44
VS
1979 Cal 391979 Cal 39

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1998 Feeling 441979 Cal 39
General
ManufacturerFeelingCal
Year1998–20051979–1985
TypeSloopSloop
CountryFranceUSA
DesignerPhilippe Harlé / Mortain & MavrikiosBill Lapworth / C. Raymond Hunt
Dimensions
LOA13.41 m (44.0 ft)11.89 m (39.0 ft)
LWL11.50 m (37.7 ft)9.60 m (31.5 ft)
Beam4.10 m (13.5 ft)3.66 m (12.0 ft)
Draft1.90 m (6.2 ft)1.83 m (6.0 ft)
Weight
Displacement10,500 kg (23,149 lbs)8,165 kg (18,001 lbs)
Ballast4,000 kg (8,818 lbs)3,402 kg (7,500 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area82.0 m² (883 ft²)63.0 m² (678 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine55 HP30 HP
Fuel Capacity200 L (52.8 gal)114 L (30.1 gal)
Water Capacity400 L (105.7 gal)200 L (52.8 gal)
Accommodation
Berths87
Cabins32

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1998 Feeling 44
17.37
1979 Cal 39
15.78
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1998 Feeling 44
38.10
1979 Cal 39
41.67
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1998 Feeling 44
0.75
1979 Cal 39
0.73
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1998 Feeling 44
16.90
1979 Cal 39
21.05

Detailed Comparison

The 1998 Feeling 44 and 1979 Cal 39 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1998 Feeling 44 is a 1990s design by Feeling from France, while the 1979 Cal 39 is a 1970s offering from Cal from USA. The 1998 Feeling 44 was penned by Philippe Harlé / Mortain & Mavrikios. The 1979 Cal 39 was designed by Bill Lapworth / C. Raymond Hunt.

In terms of size, the 1998 Feeling 44 measures 13.41m (44.0ft) overall with a beam of 4.10m, compared to the 1979 Cal 39 at 11.89m (39.0ft) with a 3.66m beam. The 1998 Feeling 44 is 1.52m longer than the 1979 Cal 39. The 1998 Feeling 44 displaces approximately 29% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1998 Feeling 44 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 17.37 and 82.0 m² of sail area. The 1979 Cal 39, with an SA/D of 15.78 and 63.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 1998 Feeling 44 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1998 Feeling 44 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 16.9) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.75). The 1979 Cal 39 has a comfort ratio of 21.1 and a capsize screening value of 0.73. The ballast ratios are 38.1% for the 1998 Feeling 44 and 41.7% for the 1979 Cal 39, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1998 Feeling 44 provides 8 berths in 3 cabins with 400L of water capacity and 200L of fuel. The 1979 Cal 39 offers 7 berths in 2 cabins with 200L water and 114L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1979 Cal 39 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1998 Feeling 44 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1998 Feeling 44 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1998 Feeling 44 · 1979 Cal 39