Hunter 280 vs 2000 Najad 355 — Comparison
Hunter 280
Specifications Side by Side
| Specification | Hunter 280 | 2000 Najad 355 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Manufacturer | Hunter | Najad |
| Year | 1998–2003 | 2000–2010 |
| Type | Sloop | Sloop |
| Country | USA | Sweden |
| Designer | Glenn Henderson | Judel/Vrolijk |
| Dimensions | ||
| LOA | 8.53 m (28.0 ft) | 10.72 m (35.2 ft) |
| LWL | 7.47 m (24.5 ft) | 9.00 m (29.5 ft) |
| Beam | 2.82 m (9.3 ft) | 3.38 m (11.1 ft) |
| Draft | 1.52 m (5.0 ft) | 1.75 m (5.7 ft) |
| Weight | ||
| Displacement | 2,585 kg (5,699 lbs) | 6,000 kg (13,228 lbs) |
| Ballast | 998 kg (2,200 lbs) | 2,400 kg (5,291 lbs) |
| Sailing | ||
| Sail Area | 34.0 m² (366 ft²) | 51.0 m² (549 ft²) |
| Hull Material | Fiberglass | Fiberglass |
| Keel Type | Fin | Fin |
| Engine & Tanks | ||
| Engine | 15 HP | 28 HP |
| Fuel Capacity | 45 L (11.9 gal) | 110 L (29.1 gal) |
| Water Capacity | 76 L (20.1 gal) | 180 L (47.6 gal) |
| Accommodation | ||
| Berths | 5 | 6 |
| Cabins | 1 | 2 |
Performance Comparison
Detailed Comparison
The Hunter 280 and 2000 Najad 355 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The Hunter 280 is a 1990s design by Hunter from USA, while the 2000 Najad 355 is a 2000s offering from Najad from Sweden. The Hunter 280 was penned by Glenn Henderson. The 2000 Najad 355 was designed by Judel/Vrolijk.
In terms of size, the Hunter 280 measures 8.53m (28.0ft) overall with a beam of 2.82m, compared to the 2000 Najad 355 at 10.72m (35.2ft) with a 3.38m beam. The 2000 Najad 355 is 2.19m longer than the Hunter 280. The 2000 Najad 355 displaces approximately 132% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.
Looking at performance, the Hunter 280 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 18.35 and 34.0 m² of sail area. The 2000 Najad 355, with an SA/D of 15.69 and 51.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The Hunter 280 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.
For comfort and safety, the Hunter 280 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 16.5) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.82). The 2000 Najad 355 has a comfort ratio of 20.1 and a capsize screening value of 0.75. The ballast ratios are 38.6% for the Hunter 280 and 40.0% for the 2000 Najad 355, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.
Below deck, the Hunter 280 provides 5 berths in 1 cabin with 76L of water capacity and 45L of fuel. The 2000 Najad 355 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 180L water and 110L fuel capacity.
Verdict
For cruising: The 2000 Najad 355 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.
For racing: The Hunter 280 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.
For liveaboard: The 2000 Najad 355 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.
Compare Different Boats
Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats
Or view individual specs: Hunter 280 · 2000 Najad 355