1998 X-Yachts 332 vs Hunter 31 — Comparison

1998 X-Yachts 332
VS
Hunter 31Hunter 31

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1998 X-Yachts 332Hunter 31
General
ManufacturerX-YachtsHunter
Year1998–20032000–2005
TypeSloopSloop
CountryDenmarkUSA
DesignerNiels JeppesenGlenn Henderson
Dimensions
LOA10.06 m (33.0 ft)9.45 m (31.0 ft)
LWL8.69 m (28.5 ft)8.23 m (27.0 ft)
Beam3.13 m (10.3 ft)3.12 m (10.2 ft)
Draft1.80 m (5.9 ft)1.68 m (5.5 ft)
Weight
Displacement4,700 kg (10,362 lbs)4,082 kg (8,999 lbs)
Ballast1,900 kg (4,189 lbs)1,588 kg (3,501 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area50.5 m² (544 ft²)44.0 m² (474 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine18 HP18 HP
Fuel Capacity60 L (15.9 gal)57 L (15.1 gal)
Water Capacity120 L (31.7 gal)114 L (30.1 gal)
Accommodation
Berths66
Cabins22

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1998 X-Yachts 332
18.29
Hunter 31
17.51
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1998 X-Yachts 332
40.43
Hunter 31
38.90
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1998 X-Yachts 332
0.75
Hunter 31
0.78
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1998 X-Yachts 332
19.07
Hunter 31
18.65

Detailed Comparison

The 1998 X-Yachts 332 and Hunter 31 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1998 X-Yachts 332 is a 1990s design by X-Yachts from Denmark, while the Hunter 31 is a 2000s offering from Hunter from USA. The 1998 X-Yachts 332 was penned by Niels Jeppesen. The Hunter 31 was designed by Glenn Henderson.

In terms of size, the 1998 X-Yachts 332 measures 10.06m (33.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.13m, compared to the Hunter 31 at 9.45m (31.0ft) with a 3.12m beam. The 1998 X-Yachts 332 is 0.61m longer than the Hunter 31. The 1998 X-Yachts 332 displaces approximately 15% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1998 X-Yachts 332 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 18.29 and 50.5 m² of sail area. The Hunter 31, with an SA/D of 17.51 and 44.0 m² of canvas, offers good sail power for versatile performance. The 1998 X-Yachts 332 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1998 X-Yachts 332 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 19.1) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.75). The Hunter 31 has a comfort ratio of 18.7 and a capsize screening value of 0.78. The ballast ratios are 40.4% for the 1998 X-Yachts 332 and 38.9% for the Hunter 31, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1998 X-Yachts 332 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 120L of water capacity and 60L of fuel. The Hunter 31 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 114L water and 57L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1998 X-Yachts 332 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1998 X-Yachts 332 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1998 X-Yachts 332 · Hunter 31