1998 X-Yachts 332 vs 2010 X-Yachts Xc 35 — Comparison

1998 X-Yachts 332
VS
2010 X-Yachts Xc 35

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1998 X-Yachts 3322010 X-Yachts Xc 35
General
ManufacturerX-YachtsX-Yachts
Year1998–20032010–2016
TypeSloopSloop
CountryDenmarkDenmark
DesignerNiels JeppesenNiels Jeppesen
Dimensions
LOA10.06 m (33.0 ft)10.57 m (34.7 ft)
LWL8.69 m (28.5 ft)9.20 m (30.2 ft)
Beam3.13 m (10.3 ft)3.35 m (11.0 ft)
Draft1.80 m (5.9 ft)1.80 m (5.9 ft)
Weight
Displacement4,700 kg (10,362 lbs)5,800 kg (12,787 lbs)
Ballast1,900 kg (4,189 lbs)2,100 kg (4,630 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area50.5 m² (544 ft²)52.0 m² (560 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine18 HP21 HP
Fuel Capacity60 L (15.9 gal)70 L (18.5 gal)
Water Capacity120 L (31.7 gal)140 L (37.0 gal)
Accommodation
Berths66
Cabins22

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1998 X-Yachts 332
18.29
2010 X-Yachts Xc 35
16.37
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1998 X-Yachts 332
40.43
2010 X-Yachts Xc 35
36.21
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1998 X-Yachts 332
0.75
2010 X-Yachts Xc 35
0.75
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1998 X-Yachts 332
19.07
2010 X-Yachts Xc 35
19.28

Detailed Comparison

The 1998 X-Yachts 332 and 2010 X-Yachts Xc 35 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1998 X-Yachts 332 is a 1990s design by X-Yachts from Denmark, while the 2010 X-Yachts Xc 35 is a modern offering from X-Yachts from Denmark. The 1998 X-Yachts 332 was penned by Niels Jeppesen. The 2010 X-Yachts Xc 35 was designed by Niels Jeppesen.

In terms of size, the 1998 X-Yachts 332 measures 10.06m (33.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.13m, compared to the 2010 X-Yachts Xc 35 at 10.57m (34.7ft) with a 3.35m beam. The 2010 X-Yachts Xc 35 is 0.51m longer than the 1998 X-Yachts 332. The 2010 X-Yachts Xc 35 displaces approximately 23% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1998 X-Yachts 332 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 18.29 and 50.5 m² of sail area. The 2010 X-Yachts Xc 35, with an SA/D of 16.37 and 52.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 1998 X-Yachts 332 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1998 X-Yachts 332 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 19.1) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.75). The 2010 X-Yachts Xc 35 has a comfort ratio of 19.3 and a capsize screening value of 0.75. The ballast ratios are 40.4% for the 1998 X-Yachts 332 and 36.2% for the 2010 X-Yachts Xc 35, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1998 X-Yachts 332 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 120L of water capacity and 60L of fuel. The 2010 X-Yachts Xc 35 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 140L water and 70L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 2010 X-Yachts Xc 35 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1998 X-Yachts 332 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1998 X-Yachts 332 · 2010 X-Yachts Xc 35