Catalina 36 MkII vs 1978 Cape Dory 270 — Comparison

Catalina 36 MkII
VS
1978 Cape Dory 270

Specifications Side by Side

SpecificationCatalina 36 MkII1978 Cape Dory 270
General
ManufacturerCatalinaCape Dory
Year1999–20061978–1985
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSAUSA
DesignerGerry DouglasCarl Alberg
Dimensions
LOA10.97 m (36.0 ft)8.23 m (27.0 ft)
LWL9.60 m (31.5 ft)6.40 m (21.0 ft)
Beam3.55 m (11.6 ft)2.59 m (8.5 ft)
Draft1.83 m (6.0 ft)1.14 m (3.7 ft)
Weight
Displacement6,577 kg (14,500 lbs)2,722 kg (6,001 lbs)
Ballast2,495 kg (5,501 lbs)1,134 kg (2,500 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area56.5 m² (608 ft²)28.0 m² (301 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFull
Engine & Tanks
Engine27 HP12 HP
Fuel Capacity95 L (25.1 gal)38 L (10.0 gal)
Water Capacity189 L (49.9 gal)68 L (18.0 gal)
Accommodation
Berths74
Cabins21

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
Catalina 36 MkII
16.35
1978 Cape Dory 270
14.60
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
Catalina 36 MkII
37.94
1978 Cape Dory 270
41.66
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
Catalina 36 MkII
0.76
1978 Cape Dory 270
0.74
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
Catalina 36 MkII
18.65
1978 Cape Dory 270
24.39

Detailed Comparison

The Catalina 36 MkII and 1978 Cape Dory 270 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The Catalina 36 MkII is a 1990s design by Catalina from USA, while the 1978 Cape Dory 270 is a 1970s offering from Cape Dory from USA. The Catalina 36 MkII was penned by Gerry Douglas. The 1978 Cape Dory 270 was designed by Carl Alberg.

In terms of size, the Catalina 36 MkII measures 10.97m (36.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.55m, compared to the 1978 Cape Dory 270 at 8.23m (27.0ft) with a 2.59m beam. The Catalina 36 MkII is 2.74m longer than the 1978 Cape Dory 270. The Catalina 36 MkII displaces approximately 142% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the Catalina 36 MkII has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.35 and 56.5 m² of sail area. The 1978 Cape Dory 270, with an SA/D of 14.60 and 28.0 m² of canvas, offers modest sail power for its displacement. The Catalina 36 MkII has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the Catalina 36 MkII offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 18.7) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.76). The 1978 Cape Dory 270 has a comfort ratio of 24.4 and a capsize screening value of 0.74. The ballast ratios are 37.9% for the Catalina 36 MkII and 41.7% for the 1978 Cape Dory 270, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the Catalina 36 MkII provides 7 berths in 2 cabins with 189L of water capacity and 95L of fuel. The 1978 Cape Dory 270 offers 4 berths in 1 cabin with 68L water and 38L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1978 Cape Dory 270 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The Catalina 36 MkII has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The Catalina 36 MkII offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: Catalina 36 MkII · 1978 Cape Dory 270