1999 Catalina 400 vs Hanse 320 — Comparison

1999 Catalina 400 1999 Catalina 400
VS
Hanse 320 Hanse 320

Specifications Side by Side

Specification 1999 Catalina 400 Hanse 320
General
Manufacturer Catalina Hanse
Year 1999–2006 2005–2010
Type Sloop Sloop
Country USA Germany
Designer Gerry Douglas judel/vrolijk & co
Dimensions
LOA 12.12 m (39.8 ft) 9.92 m (32.5 ft)
LWL 10.36 m (34.0 ft) 8.80 m (28.9 ft)
Beam 3.86 m (12.7 ft) 3.28 m (10.8 ft)
Draft 1.98 m (6.5 ft) 1.70 m (5.6 ft)
Weight
Displacement 8,845 kg (19,500 lbs) 4,600 kg (10,141 lbs)
Ballast 3,629 kg (8,001 lbs) 1,400 kg (3,086 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area 66.9 m² (720 ft²) 46.0 m² (495 ft²)
Hull Material Fiberglass Fiberglass
Keel Type Fin Fin
Engine & Tanks
Engine 40 HP 18 HP
Fuel Capacity 151 L (39.9 gal) 90 L (23.8 gal)
Water Capacity 303 L (80.0 gal) 150 L (39.6 gal)
Accommodation
Berths 8 6
Cabins 3 2

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1999 Catalina 400
15.89
Hanse 320
16.90
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1999 Catalina 400
41.03
Hanse 320
30.43
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1999 Catalina 400
0.75
Hanse 320
0.79
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1999 Catalina 400
18.97
Hanse 320
17.40

Detailed Comparison

The 1999 Catalina 400 and Hanse 320 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1999 Catalina 400 is a 1990s design by Catalina from USA, while the Hanse 320 is a 2000s offering from Hanse from Germany. The 1999 Catalina 400 was penned by Gerry Douglas. The Hanse 320 was designed by judel/vrolijk & co.

In terms of size, the 1999 Catalina 400 measures 12.12m (39.8ft) overall with a beam of 3.86m, compared to the Hanse 320 at 9.92m (32.5ft) with a 3.28m beam. The 1999 Catalina 400 is 2.20m longer than the Hanse 320. The 1999 Catalina 400 displaces approximately 92% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1999 Catalina 400 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 15.89 and 66.9 m² of sail area. The Hanse 320, with an SA/D of 16.90 and 46.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The Hanse 320 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1999 Catalina 400 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 19.0) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.75). The Hanse 320 has a comfort ratio of 17.4 and a capsize screening value of 0.79. The ballast ratios are 41.0% for the 1999 Catalina 400 and 30.4% for the Hanse 320, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1999 Catalina 400 provides 8 berths in 3 cabins with 303L of water capacity and 151L of fuel. The Hanse 320 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 150L water and 90L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1999 Catalina 400 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The Hanse 320 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1999 Catalina 400 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

VS