1999 Hallberg-Rassy 55 vs 2013 Moody 54 — Comparison

1999 Hallberg-Rassy 55 1999 Hallberg-Rassy 55
VS
2013 Moody 54 2013 Moody 54

Specifications Side by Side

Specification 1999 Hallberg-Rassy 55 2013 Moody 54
General
Manufacturer Hallberg-Rassy Moody
Year 1999–2005 2013–2018
Type Sloop Sloop
Country Sweden Germany
Designer German Frers Bill Dixon
Dimensions
LOA 16.80 m (55.1 ft) 16.18 m (53.1 ft)
LWL 14.00 m (45.9 ft) 14.50 m (47.6 ft)
Beam 4.65 m (15.3 ft) 4.90 m (16.1 ft)
Draft 2.35 m (7.7 ft) 2.15 m (7.1 ft)
Weight
Displacement 20,000 kg (44,092 lbs) 21,000 kg (46,297 lbs)
Ballast 7,500 kg (16,535 lbs) 7,500 kg (16,535 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area 125.0 m² (1,346 ft²) 125.0 m² (1,346 ft²)
Hull Material Fiberglass Fiberglass
Keel Type Fin Fin
Engine & Tanks
Engine 150 HP 110 HP
Fuel Capacity 600 L (158.5 gal) 450 L (118.9 gal)
Water Capacity 900 L (237.8 gal) 700 L (184.9 gal)
Accommodation
Berths 8 8
Cabins 4 3

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1999 Hallberg-Rassy 55
17.23
2013 Moody 54
16.68
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1999 Hallberg-Rassy 55
37.50
2013 Moody 54
35.71
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1999 Hallberg-Rassy 55
0.69
2013 Moody 54
0.71
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1999 Hallberg-Rassy 55
18.01
2013 Moody 54
17.25

Detailed Comparison

The 1999 Hallberg-Rassy 55 and 2013 Moody 54 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1999 Hallberg-Rassy 55 is a 1990s design by Hallberg-Rassy from Sweden, while the 2013 Moody 54 is a modern offering from Moody from Germany. The 1999 Hallberg-Rassy 55 was penned by German Frers. The 2013 Moody 54 was designed by Bill Dixon.

In terms of size, the 1999 Hallberg-Rassy 55 measures 16.80m (55.1ft) overall with a beam of 4.65m, compared to the 2013 Moody 54 at 16.18m (53.1ft) with a 4.90m beam. The 1999 Hallberg-Rassy 55 is 0.62m longer than the 2013 Moody 54. The 2013 Moody 54 displaces approximately 5% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1999 Hallberg-Rassy 55 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 17.23 and 125.0 m² of sail area. The 2013 Moody 54, with an SA/D of 16.68 and 125.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 1999 Hallberg-Rassy 55 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1999 Hallberg-Rassy 55 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 18.0) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.69). The 2013 Moody 54 has a comfort ratio of 17.3 and a capsize screening value of 0.71. The ballast ratios are 37.5% for the 1999 Hallberg-Rassy 55 and 35.7% for the 2013 Moody 54, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1999 Hallberg-Rassy 55 provides 8 berths in 4 cabins with 900L of water capacity and 600L of fuel. The 2013 Moody 54 offers 8 berths in 3 cabins with 700L water and 450L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1999 Hallberg-Rassy 55 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1999 Hallberg-Rassy 55 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

VS