1999 Pacific Seacraft 40 vs 1978 Westsail 42 — Comparison

1999 Pacific Seacraft 40 1999 Pacific Seacraft 40
VS
1978 Westsail 42 1978 Westsail 42

Specifications Side by Side

Specification 1999 Pacific Seacraft 40 1978 Westsail 42
General
Manufacturer Pacific Seacraft Westsail
Year 1999–2007 1978–1983
Type Cutter Cutter
Country USA USA
Designer William Crealock William Crealock
Dimensions
LOA 12.19 m (40.0 ft) 12.80 m (42.0 ft)
LWL 9.75 m (32.0 ft) 10.36 m (34.0 ft)
Beam 3.66 m (12.0 ft) 3.81 m (12.5 ft)
Draft 1.83 m (6.0 ft) 1.83 m (6.0 ft)
Weight
Displacement 9,525 kg (20,999 lbs) 13,154 kg (29,000 lbs)
Ballast 3,856 kg (8,501 lbs) 5,443 kg (12,000 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area 70.0 m² (754 ft²) 72.0 m² (775 ft²)
Hull Material Fiberglass Fiberglass
Keel Type Full Full
Engine & Tanks
Engine 55 HP 55 HP
Fuel Capacity 189 L (49.9 gal) 227 L (60.0 gal)
Water Capacity 340 L (89.8 gal) 454 L (119.9 gal)
Accommodation
Berths 7 7
Cabins 2 3

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1999 Pacific Seacraft 40
15.83
1978 Westsail 42
13.12
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1999 Pacific Seacraft 40
40.48
1978 Westsail 42
41.38
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1999 Pacific Seacraft 40
0.69
1978 Westsail 42
0.65
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1999 Pacific Seacraft 40
23.66
1978 Westsail 42
27.65

Detailed Comparison

The 1999 Pacific Seacraft 40 and 1978 Westsail 42 represent two takes on cutter-rigged sailing. The 1999 Pacific Seacraft 40 is a 1990s design by Pacific Seacraft from USA, while the 1978 Westsail 42 is a 1970s offering from Westsail from USA. The 1999 Pacific Seacraft 40 was penned by William Crealock. The 1978 Westsail 42 was designed by William Crealock.

In terms of size, the 1999 Pacific Seacraft 40 measures 12.19m (40.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.66m, compared to the 1978 Westsail 42 at 12.80m (42.0ft) with a 3.81m beam. The 1978 Westsail 42 is 0.61m longer than the 1999 Pacific Seacraft 40. The 1978 Westsail 42 displaces approximately 38% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1999 Pacific Seacraft 40 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 15.83 and 70.0 m² of sail area. The 1978 Westsail 42, with an SA/D of 13.12 and 72.0 m² of canvas, offers modest sail power for its displacement. The 1999 Pacific Seacraft 40 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1999 Pacific Seacraft 40 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 23.7) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.69). The 1978 Westsail 42 has a comfort ratio of 27.7 and a capsize screening value of 0.65. The ballast ratios are 40.5% for the 1999 Pacific Seacraft 40 and 41.4% for the 1978 Westsail 42, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1999 Pacific Seacraft 40 provides 7 berths in 2 cabins with 340L of water capacity and 189L of fuel. The 1978 Westsail 42 offers 7 berths in 3 cabins with 454L water and 227L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1978 Westsail 42 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1999 Pacific Seacraft 40 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

VS