1999 Pacific Seacraft 40 vs 1982 Cape Dory 36 — Comparison
1999 Pacific Seacraft 40
1982 Cape Dory 36
Specifications Side by Side
| Specification | 1999 Pacific Seacraft 40 | 1982 Cape Dory 36 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Manufacturer | Pacific Seacraft | Cape Dory |
| Year | 1999–2007 | 1982–1990 |
| Type | Cutter | Cutter |
| Country | USA | USA |
| Designer | William Crealock | Carl Alberg |
| Dimensions | ||
| LOA | 12.19 m (40.0 ft) | 10.97 m (36.0 ft) |
| LWL | 9.75 m (32.0 ft) | 8.69 m (28.5 ft) |
| Beam | 3.66 m (12.0 ft) | 3.28 m (10.8 ft) |
| Draft | 1.83 m (6.0 ft) | 1.52 m (5.0 ft) |
| Weight | ||
| Displacement | 9,525 kg (20,999 lbs) | 6,804 kg (15,000 lbs) |
| Ballast | 3,856 kg (8,501 lbs) | 2,722 kg (6,001 lbs) |
| Sailing | ||
| Sail Area | 70.0 m² (754 ft²) | 55.5 m² (597 ft²) |
| Hull Material | Fiberglass | Fiberglass |
| Keel Type | Full | Full |
| Engine & Tanks | ||
| Engine | 55 HP | 28 HP |
| Fuel Capacity | 189 L (49.9 gal) | 114 L (30.1 gal) |
| Water Capacity | 340 L (89.8 gal) | 189 L (49.9 gal) |
| Accommodation | ||
| Berths | 7 | 6 |
| Cabins | 2 | 2 |
Performance Comparison
Detailed Comparison
The 1999 Pacific Seacraft 40 and 1982 Cape Dory 36 represent two takes on cutter-rigged sailing. The 1999 Pacific Seacraft 40 is a 1990s design by Pacific Seacraft from USA, while the 1982 Cape Dory 36 is a 1980s offering from Cape Dory from USA. The 1999 Pacific Seacraft 40 was penned by William Crealock. The 1982 Cape Dory 36 was designed by Carl Alberg.
In terms of size, the 1999 Pacific Seacraft 40 measures 12.19m (40.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.66m, compared to the 1982 Cape Dory 36 at 10.97m (36.0ft) with a 3.28m beam. The 1999 Pacific Seacraft 40 is 1.22m longer than the 1982 Cape Dory 36. The 1999 Pacific Seacraft 40 displaces approximately 40% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.
Looking at performance, the 1999 Pacific Seacraft 40 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 15.83 and 70.0 m² of sail area. The 1982 Cape Dory 36, with an SA/D of 15.70 and 55.5 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 1999 Pacific Seacraft 40 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.
For comfort and safety, the 1999 Pacific Seacraft 40 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 23.7) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.69). The 1982 Cape Dory 36 has a comfort ratio of 24.5 and a capsize screening value of 0.69. The ballast ratios are 40.5% for the 1999 Pacific Seacraft 40 and 40.0% for the 1982 Cape Dory 36, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.
Below deck, the 1999 Pacific Seacraft 40 provides 7 berths in 2 cabins with 340L of water capacity and 189L of fuel. The 1982 Cape Dory 36 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 189L water and 114L fuel capacity.
Verdict
For cruising: The 1982 Cape Dory 36 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.
For racing: The 1999 Pacific Seacraft 40 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.
For liveaboard: The 1999 Pacific Seacraft 40 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.