2000 Beneteau Oceanis 411 vs 1982 Westerly Konsort — Comparison

2000 Beneteau Oceanis 4112000 Beneteau Oceanis 411
VS
1982 Westerly Konsort1982 Westerly Konsort

Specifications Side by Side

Specification2000 Beneteau Oceanis 4111982 Westerly Konsort
General
ManufacturerBeneteauWesterly
Year2000–20051982–1990
TypeSloopSloop
CountryFranceUK
DesignerGroupe FinotEd Dubois
Dimensions
LOA12.22 m (40.1 ft)9.50 m (31.2 ft)
LWL10.52 m (34.5 ft)7.70 m (25.3 ft)
Beam3.90 m (12.8 ft)3.10 m (10.2 ft)
Draft1.80 m (5.9 ft)1.07 m (3.5 ft)
Weight
Displacement8,200 kg (18,078 lbs)4,536 kg (10,000 lbs)
Ballast2,800 kg (6,173 lbs)1,633 kg (3,600 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area69.0 m² (743 ft²)34.0 m² (366 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinBilge
Engine & Tanks
Engine40 HP15 HP
Fuel Capacity130 L (34.3 gal)68 L (18.0 gal)
Water Capacity250 L (66.0 gal)114 L (30.1 gal)
Accommodation
Berths86
Cabins32

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
2000 Beneteau Oceanis 411
17.24
1982 Westerly Konsort
12.61
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
2000 Beneteau Oceanis 411
34.15
1982 Westerly Konsort
36.00
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
2000 Beneteau Oceanis 411
0.77
1982 Westerly Konsort
0.75
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
2000 Beneteau Oceanis 411
16.90
1982 Westerly Konsort
22.75

Detailed Comparison

The 2000 Beneteau Oceanis 411 and 1982 Westerly Konsort represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 2000 Beneteau Oceanis 411 is a 2000s design by Beneteau from France, while the 1982 Westerly Konsort is a 1980s offering from Westerly from UK. The 2000 Beneteau Oceanis 411 was penned by Groupe Finot. The 1982 Westerly Konsort was designed by Ed Dubois.

In terms of size, the 2000 Beneteau Oceanis 411 measures 12.22m (40.1ft) overall with a beam of 3.90m, compared to the 1982 Westerly Konsort at 9.50m (31.2ft) with a 3.10m beam. The 2000 Beneteau Oceanis 411 is 2.72m longer than the 1982 Westerly Konsort. The 2000 Beneteau Oceanis 411 displaces approximately 81% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 2000 Beneteau Oceanis 411 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 17.24 and 69.0 m² of sail area. The 1982 Westerly Konsort, with an SA/D of 12.61 and 34.0 m² of canvas, offers modest sail power for its displacement. The 2000 Beneteau Oceanis 411 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 2000 Beneteau Oceanis 411 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 16.9) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.77). The 1982 Westerly Konsort has a comfort ratio of 22.8 and a capsize screening value of 0.75. The ballast ratios are 34.2% for the 2000 Beneteau Oceanis 411 and 36.0% for the 1982 Westerly Konsort, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 2000 Beneteau Oceanis 411 provides 8 berths in 3 cabins with 250L of water capacity and 130L of fuel. The 1982 Westerly Konsort offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 114L water and 68L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1982 Westerly Konsort is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 2000 Beneteau Oceanis 411 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 2000 Beneteau Oceanis 411 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 2000 Beneteau Oceanis 411 · 1982 Westerly Konsort