2000 Beneteau Oceanis 411 vs 1983 Nautor Swan 44 — Comparison

2000 Beneteau Oceanis 4112000 Beneteau Oceanis 411
VS
1983 Nautor Swan 44

Specifications Side by Side

Specification2000 Beneteau Oceanis 4111983 Nautor Swan 44
General
ManufacturerBeneteauNautor Swan
Year2000–20051983–1991
TypeSloopSloop
CountryFranceFinland
DesignerGroupe FinotSparkman & Stephens
Dimensions
LOA12.22 m (40.1 ft)13.41 m (44.0 ft)
LWL10.52 m (34.5 ft)10.36 m (34.0 ft)
Beam3.90 m (12.8 ft)3.86 m (12.7 ft)
Draft1.80 m (5.9 ft)2.29 m (7.5 ft)
Weight
Displacement8,200 kg (18,078 lbs)11,340 kg (25,000 lbs)
Ballast2,800 kg (6,173 lbs)4,536 kg (10,000 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area69.0 m² (743 ft²)82.0 m² (883 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine40 HP55 HP
Fuel Capacity130 L (34.3 gal)200 L (52.8 gal)
Water Capacity250 L (66.0 gal)350 L (92.5 gal)
Accommodation
Berths87
Cabins33

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
2000 Beneteau Oceanis 411
17.24
1983 Nautor Swan 44
16.50
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
2000 Beneteau Oceanis 411
34.15
1983 Nautor Swan 44
40.00
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
2000 Beneteau Oceanis 411
0.77
1983 Nautor Swan 44
0.69
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
2000 Beneteau Oceanis 411
16.90
1983 Nautor Swan 44
22.67

Detailed Comparison

The 2000 Beneteau Oceanis 411 and 1983 Nautor Swan 44 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 2000 Beneteau Oceanis 411 is a 2000s design by Beneteau from France, while the 1983 Nautor Swan 44 is a 1980s offering from Nautor Swan from Finland. The 2000 Beneteau Oceanis 411 was penned by Groupe Finot. The 1983 Nautor Swan 44 was designed by Sparkman & Stephens.

In terms of size, the 2000 Beneteau Oceanis 411 measures 12.22m (40.1ft) overall with a beam of 3.90m, compared to the 1983 Nautor Swan 44 at 13.41m (44.0ft) with a 3.86m beam. The 1983 Nautor Swan 44 is 1.19m longer than the 2000 Beneteau Oceanis 411. The 1983 Nautor Swan 44 displaces approximately 38% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 2000 Beneteau Oceanis 411 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 17.24 and 69.0 m² of sail area. The 1983 Nautor Swan 44, with an SA/D of 16.50 and 82.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 2000 Beneteau Oceanis 411 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 2000 Beneteau Oceanis 411 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 16.9) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.77). The 1983 Nautor Swan 44 has a comfort ratio of 22.7 and a capsize screening value of 0.69. The ballast ratios are 34.2% for the 2000 Beneteau Oceanis 411 and 40.0% for the 1983 Nautor Swan 44, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 2000 Beneteau Oceanis 411 provides 8 berths in 3 cabins with 250L of water capacity and 130L of fuel. The 1983 Nautor Swan 44 offers 7 berths in 3 cabins with 350L water and 200L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1983 Nautor Swan 44 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 2000 Beneteau Oceanis 411 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 2000 Beneteau Oceanis 411 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 2000 Beneteau Oceanis 411 · 1983 Nautor Swan 44