2000 Beneteau Oceanis 411 vs 1998 Feeling 44 — Comparison

2000 Beneteau Oceanis 4112000 Beneteau Oceanis 411
VS
1998 Feeling 44

Specifications Side by Side

Specification2000 Beneteau Oceanis 4111998 Feeling 44
General
ManufacturerBeneteauFeeling
Year2000–20051998–2005
TypeSloopSloop
CountryFranceFrance
DesignerGroupe FinotPhilippe Harlé / Mortain & Mavrikios
Dimensions
LOA12.22 m (40.1 ft)13.41 m (44.0 ft)
LWL10.52 m (34.5 ft)11.50 m (37.7 ft)
Beam3.90 m (12.8 ft)4.10 m (13.5 ft)
Draft1.80 m (5.9 ft)1.90 m (6.2 ft)
Weight
Displacement8,200 kg (18,078 lbs)10,500 kg (23,149 lbs)
Ballast2,800 kg (6,173 lbs)4,000 kg (8,818 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area69.0 m² (743 ft²)82.0 m² (883 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine40 HP55 HP
Fuel Capacity130 L (34.3 gal)200 L (52.8 gal)
Water Capacity250 L (66.0 gal)400 L (105.7 gal)
Accommodation
Berths88
Cabins33

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
2000 Beneteau Oceanis 411
17.24
1998 Feeling 44
17.37
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
2000 Beneteau Oceanis 411
34.15
1998 Feeling 44
38.10
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
2000 Beneteau Oceanis 411
0.77
1998 Feeling 44
0.75
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
2000 Beneteau Oceanis 411
16.90
1998 Feeling 44
16.90

Detailed Comparison

The 2000 Beneteau Oceanis 411 and 1998 Feeling 44 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 2000 Beneteau Oceanis 411 is a 2000s design by Beneteau from France, while the 1998 Feeling 44 is a 1990s offering from Feeling from France. The 2000 Beneteau Oceanis 411 was penned by Groupe Finot. The 1998 Feeling 44 was designed by Philippe Harlé / Mortain & Mavrikios.

In terms of size, the 2000 Beneteau Oceanis 411 measures 12.22m (40.1ft) overall with a beam of 3.90m, compared to the 1998 Feeling 44 at 13.41m (44.0ft) with a 4.10m beam. The 1998 Feeling 44 is 1.19m longer than the 2000 Beneteau Oceanis 411. The 1998 Feeling 44 displaces approximately 28% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 2000 Beneteau Oceanis 411 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 17.24 and 69.0 m² of sail area. The 1998 Feeling 44, with an SA/D of 17.37 and 82.0 m² of canvas, offers good sail power for versatile performance. The 1998 Feeling 44 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 2000 Beneteau Oceanis 411 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 16.9) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.77). The 1998 Feeling 44 has a comfort ratio of 16.9 and a capsize screening value of 0.75. The ballast ratios are 34.2% for the 2000 Beneteau Oceanis 411 and 38.1% for the 1998 Feeling 44, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 2000 Beneteau Oceanis 411 provides 8 berths in 3 cabins with 250L of water capacity and 130L of fuel. The 1998 Feeling 44 offers 8 berths in 3 cabins with 400L water and 200L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 2000 Beneteau Oceanis 411 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1998 Feeling 44 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 2000 Beneteau Oceanis 411 · 1998 Feeling 44