2000 Hallberg-Rassy 31 vs 1984 C&C 37+ — Comparison

2000 Hallberg-Rassy 31
VS
1984 C&C 37+1984 C&C 37+

Specifications Side by Side

Specification2000 Hallberg-Rassy 311984 C&C 37+
General
ManufacturerHallberg-RassyC&C Yachts
Year2000–20101984–1990
TypeSloopSloop
CountrySwedenCanada
DesignerGerman FrersCuthbertson & Cassian
Dimensions
LOA9.47 m (31.1 ft)11.28 m (37.0 ft)
LWL8.25 m (27.1 ft)9.14 m (30.0 ft)
Beam3.18 m (10.4 ft)3.56 m (11.7 ft)
Draft1.60 m (5.2 ft)1.83 m (6.0 ft)
Weight
Displacement4,600 kg (10,141 lbs)6,577 kg (14,500 lbs)
Ballast1,850 kg (4,079 lbs)2,722 kg (6,001 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area44.5 m² (479 ft²)57.0 m² (614 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine21 HP25 HP
Fuel Capacity80 L (21.1 gal)95 L (25.1 gal)
Water Capacity140 L (37.0 gal)170 L (44.9 gal)
Accommodation
Berths57
Cabins22

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
2000 Hallberg-Rassy 31
16.35
1984 C&C 37+
16.50
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
2000 Hallberg-Rassy 31
40.22
1984 C&C 37+
41.39
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
2000 Hallberg-Rassy 31
0.77
1984 C&C 37+
0.76
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
2000 Hallberg-Rassy 31
20.39
1984 C&C 37+
19.46

Detailed Comparison

The 2000 Hallberg-Rassy 31 and 1984 C&C 37+ represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 2000 Hallberg-Rassy 31 is a 2000s design by Hallberg-Rassy from Sweden, while the 1984 C&C 37+ is a 1980s offering from C&C Yachts from Canada. The 2000 Hallberg-Rassy 31 was penned by German Frers. The 1984 C&C 37+ was designed by Cuthbertson & Cassian.

In terms of size, the 2000 Hallberg-Rassy 31 measures 9.47m (31.1ft) overall with a beam of 3.18m, compared to the 1984 C&C 37+ at 11.28m (37.0ft) with a 3.56m beam. The 1984 C&C 37+ is 1.81m longer than the 2000 Hallberg-Rassy 31. The 1984 C&C 37+ displaces approximately 43% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 2000 Hallberg-Rassy 31 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.35 and 44.5 m² of sail area. The 1984 C&C 37+, with an SA/D of 16.50 and 57.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 1984 C&C 37+ has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 2000 Hallberg-Rassy 31 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 20.4) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.77). The 1984 C&C 37+ has a comfort ratio of 19.5 and a capsize screening value of 0.76. The ballast ratios are 40.2% for the 2000 Hallberg-Rassy 31 and 41.4% for the 1984 C&C 37+, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 2000 Hallberg-Rassy 31 provides 5 berths in 2 cabins with 140L of water capacity and 80L of fuel. The 1984 C&C 37+ offers 7 berths in 2 cabins with 170L water and 95L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 2000 Hallberg-Rassy 31 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1984 C&C 37+ has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1984 C&C 37+ offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 2000 Hallberg-Rassy 31 · 1984 C&C 37+