2000 Hallberg-Rassy 31 vs 2013 Beneteau Figaro 3 — Comparison

2000 Hallberg-Rassy 31
VS
2013 Beneteau Figaro 32013 Beneteau Figaro 3

Specifications Side by Side

Specification2000 Hallberg-Rassy 312013 Beneteau Figaro 3
General
ManufacturerHallberg-RassyBeneteau
Year2000–20102013
TypeSloopSloop
CountrySwedenFrance
DesignerGerman FrersVPLP / Van Peteghem Lauriot-Prévost
Dimensions
LOA9.47 m (31.1 ft)10.10 m (33.1 ft)
LWL8.25 m (27.1 ft)9.45 m (31.0 ft)
Beam3.18 m (10.4 ft)3.40 m (11.2 ft)
Draft1.60 m (5.2 ft)2.10 m (6.9 ft)
Weight
Displacement4,600 kg (10,141 lbs)3,450 kg (7,606 lbs)
Ballast1,850 kg (4,079 lbs)1,500 kg (3,307 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area44.5 m² (479 ft²)65.0 m² (700 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine21 HP20 HP
Fuel Capacity80 L (21.1 gal)60 L (15.9 gal)
Water Capacity140 L (37.0 gal)40 L (10.6 gal)
Accommodation
Berths52
Cabins21

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
2000 Hallberg-Rassy 31
16.35
2013 Beneteau Figaro 3
28.93
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
2000 Hallberg-Rassy 31
40.22
2013 Beneteau Figaro 3
43.48
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
2000 Hallberg-Rassy 31
0.77
2013 Beneteau Figaro 3
0.90
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
2000 Hallberg-Rassy 31
20.39
2013 Beneteau Figaro 3
11.16

Detailed Comparison

The 2000 Hallberg-Rassy 31 and 2013 Beneteau Figaro 3 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 2000 Hallberg-Rassy 31 is a 2000s design by Hallberg-Rassy from Sweden, while the 2013 Beneteau Figaro 3 is a modern offering from Beneteau from France. The 2000 Hallberg-Rassy 31 was penned by German Frers. The 2013 Beneteau Figaro 3 was designed by VPLP / Van Peteghem Lauriot-Prévost.

In terms of size, the 2000 Hallberg-Rassy 31 measures 9.47m (31.1ft) overall with a beam of 3.18m, compared to the 2013 Beneteau Figaro 3 at 10.10m (33.1ft) with a 3.40m beam. The 2013 Beneteau Figaro 3 is 0.63m longer than the 2000 Hallberg-Rassy 31. The 2000 Hallberg-Rassy 31 displaces approximately 33% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 2000 Hallberg-Rassy 31 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.35 and 44.5 m² of sail area. The 2013 Beneteau Figaro 3, with an SA/D of 28.93 and 65.0 m² of canvas, offers generous sail power for spirited sailing. The 2013 Beneteau Figaro 3 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 2000 Hallberg-Rassy 31 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 20.4) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.77). The 2013 Beneteau Figaro 3 has a comfort ratio of 11.2 and a capsize screening value of 0.90. The ballast ratios are 40.2% for the 2000 Hallberg-Rassy 31 and 43.5% for the 2013 Beneteau Figaro 3, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 2000 Hallberg-Rassy 31 provides 5 berths in 2 cabins with 140L of water capacity and 80L of fuel. The 2013 Beneteau Figaro 3 offers 2 berths in 1 cabin with 40L water and 60L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 2000 Hallberg-Rassy 31 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 2013 Beneteau Figaro 3 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 2000 Hallberg-Rassy 31 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 2000 Hallberg-Rassy 31 · 2013 Beneteau Figaro 3