2000 Hallberg-Rassy 31 vs 2013 Dehler 41 — Comparison

2000 Hallberg-Rassy 31
VS
2013 Dehler 412013 Dehler 41

Specifications Side by Side

Specification2000 Hallberg-Rassy 312013 Dehler 41
General
ManufacturerHallberg-RassyDehler
Year2000–20102013–2019
TypeSloopSloop
CountrySwedenGermany
DesignerGerman FrersJudel/Vrolijk
Dimensions
LOA9.47 m (31.1 ft)12.35 m (40.5 ft)
LWL8.25 m (27.1 ft)11.00 m (36.1 ft)
Beam3.18 m (10.4 ft)3.80 m (12.5 ft)
Draft1.60 m (5.2 ft)2.10 m (6.9 ft)
Weight
Displacement4,600 kg (10,141 lbs)7,800 kg (17,196 lbs)
Ballast1,850 kg (4,079 lbs)2,600 kg (5,732 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area44.5 m² (479 ft²)74.0 m² (797 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine21 HP30 HP
Fuel Capacity80 L (21.1 gal)80 L (21.1 gal)
Water Capacity140 L (37.0 gal)170 L (44.9 gal)
Accommodation
Berths57
Cabins23

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
2000 Hallberg-Rassy 31
16.35
2013 Dehler 41
19.11
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
2000 Hallberg-Rassy 31
40.22
2013 Dehler 41
33.33
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
2000 Hallberg-Rassy 31
0.77
2013 Dehler 41
0.77
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
2000 Hallberg-Rassy 31
20.39
2013 Dehler 41
15.56

Detailed Comparison

The 2000 Hallberg-Rassy 31 and 2013 Dehler 41 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 2000 Hallberg-Rassy 31 is a 2000s design by Hallberg-Rassy from Sweden, while the 2013 Dehler 41 is a modern offering from Dehler from Germany. The 2000 Hallberg-Rassy 31 was penned by German Frers. The 2013 Dehler 41 was designed by Judel/Vrolijk.

In terms of size, the 2000 Hallberg-Rassy 31 measures 9.47m (31.1ft) overall with a beam of 3.18m, compared to the 2013 Dehler 41 at 12.35m (40.5ft) with a 3.80m beam. The 2013 Dehler 41 is 2.88m longer than the 2000 Hallberg-Rassy 31. The 2013 Dehler 41 displaces approximately 70% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 2000 Hallberg-Rassy 31 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.35 and 44.5 m² of sail area. The 2013 Dehler 41, with an SA/D of 19.11 and 74.0 m² of canvas, offers good sail power for versatile performance. The 2013 Dehler 41 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 2000 Hallberg-Rassy 31 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 20.4) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.77). The 2013 Dehler 41 has a comfort ratio of 15.6 and a capsize screening value of 0.77. The ballast ratios are 40.2% for the 2000 Hallberg-Rassy 31 and 33.3% for the 2013 Dehler 41, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 2000 Hallberg-Rassy 31 provides 5 berths in 2 cabins with 140L of water capacity and 80L of fuel. The 2013 Dehler 41 offers 7 berths in 3 cabins with 170L water and 80L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 2000 Hallberg-Rassy 31 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 2013 Dehler 41 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 2013 Dehler 41 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 2000 Hallberg-Rassy 31 · 2013 Dehler 41