Hunter 31 vs 1972 Ericson 32 — Comparison

Hunter 31Hunter 31
VS
1972 Ericson 321972 Ericson 32

Specifications Side by Side

SpecificationHunter 311972 Ericson 32
General
ManufacturerHunterEricson
Year2000–20051972–1978
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSAUSA
DesignerGlenn HendersonBruce King
Dimensions
LOA9.45 m (31.0 ft)9.75 m (32.0 ft)
LWL8.23 m (27.0 ft)7.62 m (25.0 ft)
Beam3.12 m (10.2 ft)3.05 m (10.0 ft)
Draft1.68 m (5.5 ft)1.52 m (5.0 ft)
Weight
Displacement4,082 kg (8,999 lbs)4,309 kg (9,500 lbs)
Ballast1,588 kg (3,501 lbs)1,814 kg (3,999 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area44.0 m² (474 ft²)39.0 m² (420 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine18 HP15 HP
Fuel Capacity57 L (15.1 gal)57 L (15.1 gal)
Water Capacity114 L (30.1 gal)95 L (25.1 gal)
Accommodation
Berths66
Cabins22

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
Hunter 31
17.51
1972 Ericson 32
14.97
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
Hunter 31
38.90
1972 Ericson 32
42.10
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
Hunter 31
0.78
1972 Ericson 32
0.75
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
Hunter 31
18.65
1972 Ericson 32
21.98

Detailed Comparison

The Hunter 31 and 1972 Ericson 32 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The Hunter 31 is a 2000s design by Hunter from USA, while the 1972 Ericson 32 is a 1970s offering from Ericson from USA. The Hunter 31 was penned by Glenn Henderson. The 1972 Ericson 32 was designed by Bruce King.

In terms of size, the Hunter 31 measures 9.45m (31.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.12m, compared to the 1972 Ericson 32 at 9.75m (32.0ft) with a 3.05m beam. The 1972 Ericson 32 is 0.30m longer than the Hunter 31. The 1972 Ericson 32 displaces approximately 6% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the Hunter 31 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 17.51 and 44.0 m² of sail area. The 1972 Ericson 32, with an SA/D of 14.97 and 39.0 m² of canvas, offers modest sail power for its displacement. The Hunter 31 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the Hunter 31 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 18.7) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.78). The 1972 Ericson 32 has a comfort ratio of 22.0 and a capsize screening value of 0.75. The ballast ratios are 38.9% for the Hunter 31 and 42.1% for the 1972 Ericson 32, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the Hunter 31 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 114L of water capacity and 57L of fuel. The 1972 Ericson 32 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 95L water and 57L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1972 Ericson 32 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The Hunter 31 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: Hunter 31 · 1972 Ericson 32