Hunter 356 vs 1979 O'Day 28 — Comparison

Hunter 356Hunter 356
VS
1979 O'Day 281979 O'Day 28

Specifications Side by Side

SpecificationHunter 3561979 O'Day 28
General
ManufacturerHunterO'Day
Year2000–20051979–1985
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSAUSA
DesignerGlenn HendersonC. Raymond Hunt
Dimensions
LOA10.82 m (35.5 ft)8.53 m (28.0 ft)
LWL9.30 m (30.5 ft)7.01 m (23.0 ft)
Beam3.53 m (11.6 ft)2.84 m (9.3 ft)
Draft1.80 m (5.9 ft)1.37 m (4.5 ft)
Weight
Displacement5,443 kg (12,000 lbs)2,722 kg (6,001 lbs)
Ballast2,177 kg (4,799 lbs)1,089 kg (2,401 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area53.0 m² (571 ft²)31.0 m² (334 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine21 HP10 HP
Fuel Capacity76 L (20.1 gal)38 L (10.0 gal)
Water Capacity151 L (39.9 gal)57 L (15.1 gal)
Accommodation
Berths65
Cabins21

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
Hunter 356
17.40
1979 O'Day 28
16.16
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
Hunter 356
40.00
1979 O'Day 28
40.01
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
Hunter 356
0.80
1979 O'Day 28
0.81
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
Hunter 356
16.38
1979 O'Day 28
18.69

Detailed Comparison

The Hunter 356 and 1979 O'Day 28 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The Hunter 356 is a 2000s design by Hunter from USA, while the 1979 O'Day 28 is a 1970s offering from O'Day from USA. The Hunter 356 was penned by Glenn Henderson. The 1979 O'Day 28 was designed by C. Raymond Hunt.

In terms of size, the Hunter 356 measures 10.82m (35.5ft) overall with a beam of 3.53m, compared to the 1979 O'Day 28 at 8.53m (28.0ft) with a 2.84m beam. The Hunter 356 is 2.29m longer than the 1979 O'Day 28. The Hunter 356 displaces approximately 100% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the Hunter 356 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 17.40 and 53.0 m² of sail area. The 1979 O'Day 28, with an SA/D of 16.16 and 31.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The Hunter 356 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the Hunter 356 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 16.4) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.80). The 1979 O'Day 28 has a comfort ratio of 18.7 and a capsize screening value of 0.81. The ballast ratios are 40.0% for the Hunter 356 and 40.0% for the 1979 O'Day 28, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the Hunter 356 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 151L of water capacity and 76L of fuel. The 1979 O'Day 28 offers 5 berths in 1 cabin with 57L water and 38L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1979 O'Day 28 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The Hunter 356 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The Hunter 356 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: Hunter 356 · 1979 O'Day 28